Skip to content

Creston, BC · Charitable organization

Creston Valley Gleaners Society

Operating food bank contributing to day care lunches and school breakfast programs providing support to elderly awording annual education bursaries.

C$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$42k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$132k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Creston Valley Ministerial AssociationC$42,000
Fields Forward SocietyC$40,000
Valley Community Services SocietyC$29,950
Angel Flight East KootenayC$10,000
Creston Valley Food Action CoalitionC$10,000
Cresteramics Society for the HandicappedC$6,500
Creston Concert SocietyC$5,000
Creston Valley Society for Therapeutic HorsemanshipC$3,000
Boswell Memorial Hall SocietyC$3,000
Creston Options for Sexual HealthC$710
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$597k · 16 repeat orgsC$212k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

C$597k
C$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+16%

Still filing today

94%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$149k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$162k · revenue +55%
  • CV
    CRESTON VALLEY MISTERIAL ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$121k · revenue +93% · 29% of their budget
  • TB
    The Board of Education of School District No. 8
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$81k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CV
    CRESTON VALLEY COMMUNITY HOUSING SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +56%
  • KR
    Kootenay Regional Association for Community Living
    one grant, 2017 · C$13k · revenue -49%
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 8(KOOTENAY LAK
    one grant, 2021 · C$8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia Valley Housing Society

Advocate for and develop affordable housing opportunities in the columbia valley

—
2
Comox Bay Care Society

Improving access to healthcare and related services through relationship building with individuals who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness in the comox valley.

—
3
Comox Valley Recovery Centre Society

Drug and alcohol treatment

—
4
Kootenay Society for Community Living

Day programs in nelson & castlegar creton community inclusion life skills supports & recreations. nine residential home in castlegar nelson & grand forks providing 24/7 supports for people with developmental disabilities.

—
5
Columbia Valley Greenways Trail Alliance

Developing maintaining and advocating responsible use of non-motorized trails on public and private land in the columbia valley of british columbia

—
6
Comox Valley Hospice Society

Provided palliative support to persons facing terminal illness and support to family and friends of terminally ill individuals

—
7
Comox Valley Family Services Association

The Association provides healthy support for children and families family development support and therapeutic counselling. The support and counselling is for individuals and in group environments.

—
8
Kootenay Boundary Regional Hospital and Health Foundation Society

The Foundation an independent chartable society raises gifts and annual funds to support healthcare equipment needs staff education patient care and comfort and special initiatives to enhance the healthcare of the Kootenay Boundary…

—
9
Kootenay Columbia Trails Society

Establish and maintain a recreational trail network in and around the municipalities of Rossland Trail Warfield Montrose and Fruitvale in British Columbia for self-propelled activities including walking hiking trail running biking and…

—
10
Coha Foundation

To provide support and funding to the central okanagan hospice association

—
11
Fraser Canyon Hospice Society

Provide counselling and aid to patients and families dealing with terminal illness and their bereavement. assist in providing palliative care in the upper fraser valley and fraser canyon of british columbia

—
12
Central Kootenay Spay Neuter Animal Program Society

The spaying and neutering of cats and dogs within the creston valley including public educaiton of the benefits of spaying neutering for pets their owners and the community

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Community Services Society and the most unlike its peers is Creston Ministerial Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES — C$161,651 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetCRESTON VALLEY MISTERIAL ASSOCIATION — C$121,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetThe Board of Education of School District No. 8 — C$80,905 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERIOR HEALTH AUTHORITY — C$67,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCreston Valley Hospice Society — C$60,000 over 6y, 34% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT EAST KOOTENAY — C$30,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCRESTON VALLEY COMMUNITY HOUSING SOCIETY — C$20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTrinity United Church — C$14,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetHOLY CROSS CHURCH — C$13,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetKootenay Regional Association for Community Living — C$12,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCRESTERAMICS SOCIETY FOR THE HANDICAPPED — C$12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSearch & Rescue — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRESTON VALLEY MUSIC TEACHERS ASSOCIATION — C$9,200 over 5y, 20% of budgetEAST KOOTENAY FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ROCKIES FOUNDATION — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRESTON & DISTRICT SOCIETY FOR HANDICAPPED LIVING — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRESTON OPTIONS FOR SEXUAL HEALTH — C$4,910 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOSWELL MEMORIAL HALL SOCIETY — C$2,800 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetEvangelical Covenant Church — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEast Kootenay Friends of Burma — C$2,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetKOOTENAI COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$685 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEast Kootenay Addiction Services Society — C$650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN ALLIANCE FOR LITERACY — C$600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBC SENIOR GAMES — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBC/YUKON COMMAND OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION FOUNDATION — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Creston Valley Community FoundationBC24.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Creston Valley Community Foundation · Trinity United Church · The Western Communities Foundation · St. Stephen's Presbyterian Church · Community Foundation of the Kootenay Rockies · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · United Way British Columbia · Vancouver Foundation · Community Foundations of Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · Abundance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 118879501:2024-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Creston Valley Gleaners Society’s filings →