London, ON · Charitable organization
Covenant Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Religious worship services pastoral care biblical instruction public health education in uganda
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLIANCE EVANGELIQUE REFORMEE-INSTITUT FAREL FACULTE DE THE | C$6,500 |
| CANADIAN PRESBYTERIAN MISSIONS | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$300 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EOEMMANUEL OTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH2× · 2019–2020 · C$17k · revenue +28%
- AEALLIANCE EVANGELIQUE REFORMEE-INSTITUT FAREL FACULTE DE THE2× · 2022–2023 · C$10k · revenue +59%
- CCCANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIES5× · 2017–2022 · C$880 · revenue +36%
Funded once
- FRFAITH REFORMED CHURCH OF TELKWA (URC-NA)one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -26%
- EOEmmanuel Orthodox Presbyterian Churchone grant, 2018 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMMANUEL OTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds EGLISE REFORMEE ST. MARC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE EVANGELIQUE REFORMEE-INSTITUT FAREL FACULTE DE THE ↗
- Who funds FAITH REFORMED CHURCH OF TELKWA (URC-NA) ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN PRESBYTERIAN MISSIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.