Caledon, ON · Charitable organization
Covenant Keepers Ministry
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN OF HOPE | C$500 |
| SOUTH BRAMPTON NT CHURCH OF GOD | C$100 |
| DIVINE FAVOUR 7TH DAY | C$90 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DFDIVINE FAVOUR 7TH DAY MINISTRY 1004× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +53%
- COCHILDREN OF HOPE2× · 2018–2024 · C$1k · revenue +107%
- FCFIRST CHURCH OF GOD3× · 2017–2023 · C$830 · revenue +19%
Funded once
- COCHILDREN OF HOPE HAITIgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +36%
- COCHURCH OF ARCHANGEL MICHAEL TEKLONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +56%
- HTHARVEST TIME UNITED CHURCHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$100 · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organizations's purpose is to be a beacon of faith hope and love so that people can discover their worth to god and thier potential to accomplish great things for god. the organization provides religious teaching and fellowship…
Promote the gospel and help people in need. also promote christ and the church.
Preaching Teaching
We Conduct Christian Religious Service weekly. We conduct Sunday School for Children and also Bible Teaching for Adults We give pastoral care and counseling we offer Spiritual and physical care to the congregation and community
Preach and advance the teaching of the christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with faith
Advancement of religion Education and Religious instruction relief of poverty
Gospel preaching and religious education of congregation. spiritual counseling and christian fellowship. weekly bible studies. sunday school classes for children and adults.
1. preaching the word of god 2. lay ministries (youth women men and seniors) 3. bible studies 4. sunday school 5. counseling 6. outreach (visitations to jails nursing homes individual homes etc) 7. fundraising 8. transportation
To provide spiritual support guidance and teaching through the holy bible on a weekly basis. other programs include sunday school youth programs and mission
Sunday services / sunday school / youth programs / childrens' programs / pastoral care
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Divine Favour 7TH Day Ministries Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Children of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.