Delhi, ON · Charitable organization
Courtland United Church
Church services weddings & funerals mid-week study groups u.c.w.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA M&S | C$7,108 |
| DELHI SHARING PANTRY (FOOD BANK) | C$200 |
| HALDIMAND - NORFOLK WOMEN'S SHELTER | C$200 |
| CARIBBEAN OUTREACH WORKERS PROGRAM | C$100 |
| 5 OAKS EDUCATION CENTRE | C$100 |
| CAMP RYERSON | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA M&S8× · 2017–2024 · C$43k · revenue +22%
- CRCAMP RYERSON8× · 2017–2024 · C$800 · revenue +1%
- FOFIVE OAKS EDUCATION CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$800 · revenue +148%
Funded once
- NPNorfolk Pregnancy Centreone grant, 2018 · C$160
- CWCARIBBEAN WORKERS OUTREACH PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · C$100
- HWHALDIMAND-NORFOLD WOMEN'S SERVICESone grant, 2020 · C$100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.