Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Quebec, QC · Private foundation

Courir Pour la Vie Inc.

Promotion de la prévention du suicide; recrutement de coureurs bénévoles qui effectuent une levée de fonds en lien avec un défi sportif; chaque participant peut choisir le centre de prévention du suicide qu'il désire appuyer.

C$10k
Granted FY2021
4
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$4,143
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Centre de prévention du suicide du Haut-RichelieuC$4,143
Centre de prévention du suicide de la Haute-YamaskaC$4,143
Maison sous les arbresC$1,640
Centre de prévention du suicide Côte-NordC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$188k · 16 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +97% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

C$188k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+97%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE DE LA HAUTE-YAMASKA
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$45k · revenue +59%
  • FD
    Fondation du centre de prévention du suicide de Québec
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$40k · revenue +211%
  • CD
    centre de prévention du suicide Région 02
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$22k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CP
    Centre prévention suicide le Faubourggraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$812 · revenue +97%
  • RD
    RESOURCE DE TRANSITION LE TOURNANT
    one grant, 2019 · C$170
  • CD
    Centre d'écoute et de prévention suicide Drummondgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$50 · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre Prevention Suicide Du Krtb
—
2
La Traversée centre de crise et de prévention du suicide

Centre de prévention du suicide

—
3
Centre De Prevention Du Suicide De Rouyn-Noranda (C.P.S.R.N.)
—
4
Centre de Prevention du Suicide C.P.S.

Intervenir dans la problématique du suicide sur le pln clinique auprès des personnes suicidaires et de leurs proches. intervenir auprès des personnes endeuillées. fournir de la formation aux intervenvants de différents milieux et…

—
5
Centre De PrÉVention Du Suicide De Senneterre

Apporte de l.aide de nature affective et psychologique en prevention du suicide

—
6
Jevi Centre De Prevention Du Suicide - Estrie

Intervention téléphonique auprès de personnes suicidaires de leurs proches et des personnes endeuillées à la suite d'un suicide ; suivi court terme auprès des personnes suicidaires ; suivi étroit auprès de personnes en danger grave de…

—
7
Centre de prévention du suicide du Témiscamingue

Prévention suicide élaboration de programmes de formation élaboration de programmes de sensibilisation et de prévention

—
8
Le Centre De Prevention Du Suicide De Lanaudiere

Ligne d'intervention téléphonique 24/7; activités de sensibilisation prévention offerte à la population; formation offerte aux invervenants; formation programme de sentinelles; groupe de soutien pour personnes endeuillées; intervention…

—
9
Centre De Prevention Du Suicide De Malartic Inc

Local d'information en prévention du suicide; ligne d'aide téléphonique. il a comme principale objectif la prévention sensibilisation promotion postvention et formation en prévention du suicide dans la région de malartic.

—
10
Regroupement des centres de prevéntion du suicide du Québec

Concerter et mobiliser ses membres en lien avec i offre de services des cps du québec/ représenter ses membres auprès d interocuteurs divers/ faire connaître et reconnaître les services les pratiques et l expertise des cps / enrichir les…

—
11
Mouvance

Sensibilisation à la prévention du suicide promotion de la santé mentale

—
12
Centre De PrÉVention Du Suicide D'abitibi-Ouest Inc.

Par ses services il vise à éviter la détérioration de l'état des personnes en situation de détresse ou de crise suicidaire et à réduire l'apparition et le développement d'idées ou de comportements suicidaires. il a également pour mission…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre prévention suicide Le Faubourg and the most unlike its peers is Maison sous les Arbres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
18/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE DE LA HAUTE-YAMASKA — C$45,065 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetFondation du centre de prévention du suicide de Québec — C$40,417 over 3y, 11% of budgetcentre de prévention du suicide Région 02 — C$22,137 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSuicide Action Montréal — C$16,988 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION SUISIDE ARTHABASKA-ÉRAB LE INC — C$10,808 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMAISON SOUS LES ARBRES — C$9,106 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCentre d'écoute téléphonique et de prévention du suicide Bea — C$8,286 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCentre de prévention du suicide du Haut-Richelieu — C$7,409 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAssociation Québécoise de prévention du suicide — C$7,285 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCentre de prévention du suicide d'Amos inc. — C$5,840 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCentre Prévention Suicide Les Deux-Rives — C$5,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCentre de prévention du suicide de Charlevoix — C$4,809 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCentre de prévention du suicide Côte-Nord — C$1,796 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRessource de transition Le Tournant — C$1,711 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentre prévention suicide le Faubourg — C$812 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetService régional de crise de Laval (L'îlot) — C$590 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE ET D'INTERVENTION DE CRISE D — C$410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentre d'écoute et de prévention suicide Drummond — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…Centraide Du Grand Mo…La Fondation Chopin P…The Canadian Red Cros…United Way East Ontar…Charities Aid Foundat…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC9.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · La Fondation Chopin Peladeau · The Canadian Red Cross Society / la Societe Canadienne de la Croix-Rouge · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under community resource.

Source object 824418503:2021-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Courir Pour la Vie’s filings →