Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Candiac, QC · Charitable organization

Corne d'abondance de Candiac

L'organisme exploite une banque alimentaire pour les plus démunis opère une friperie à partir de dons de vêtements et d'articles de maison les profits vont au comptoir alimentaire organise une guignolée annuelle et distribue des paniers de Noël.

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$654k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
La maison d'hébergement l'ÉgideC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$48k · 3 repeat orgsC$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

C$48k
C$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PAROISSE DE LA NATIVITÉ DE LA SAINTE-VIERGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$33k · revenue +43%
  • OB
    Opération boîte à chaussures pour réfugiés
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$8k · revenue +88%
  • MD
    Maison d'hébergement L'Égide
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$8k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • PD
    Paroisse de La Nativité de la Sainte-Vierge
    one grant, 2019 · C$17k · revenue +15%
  • SS
    S.A.S. Soutien Autisme Soutiengraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +98%
  • MD
    Maison de la Famille Katerigraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Maison Séjour

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant

—
2
La citad'elle de Lachute

Procurer aux femmes victimes de violence un refuge temporaire sécuritaire et un service d'accompagnement et d'informations.

—
3
La Maison La Nacelle

Maison d'aide et d'hébergement pour femmes victimes de violence conjuguale avec ou sans enfants.

—
4
Maison Marie-Rollet

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentées et en difficulté accompagnées ou non de leurs enfants.

—
5
La maison de Marthe

Accompagner les femmes qui le désirent de toutes les manières possibles dans toutes les étapes des processus de sortie de la prostitution et de leur réinsertion sociale.

—
6
La Maison 'Unies-Vers-Femmes'

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentées

—
7
Maison d'hébergement d'Anjou

Accueil et hébergement pour femmes en difficultés avec ou sans enfants. programme d'intervention visant l'autonomie féminine . programme de sensibilisation à l'externe.

—
8
Maison Le Paravent

La maison le paravent a été constituée le 9 mars 2021 et a officiellement ouvert ses portes le 13 juillet 2022 elle a pour mission de soutenir accompagner et héberger des femmes en situation d’itinérance ou à risque d’itinérance dans leurs…

—
9
Maison Anita Lebel

Offrir aux femmes victimes de violence conjugale ave ou sans enfants un logement sécuritaire et abordable. offrir un suivi psychosocial individuel et de groupe aux femmes. orienter les femmes vers des services d'aide et de support.

—
10
Maison l'éclaircie

Aide aux anorexiques-boulimiques

—
11
Maison Libere-Elles

Maison d'hébergement pour femmes vlolentées

—
12
Le Rempart - Centre d'hébergement et d'accueil

Héberger des femmes en situation d’itinérance ou à risque de répondre à leurs besoins immédiats et de fournir des services d’accompagnement et de soutien favorisant leur réinsertion sociale.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du refuge pour femmes Chez Doris Inc. Chez Doris Women's Shelter Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Du College Champlain Saint-Lambert Champlain Collegesaint-Lambert Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
14/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPAROISSE DE LA NATIVITÉ DE LA SAINTE-VIERGE — C$33,360 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetParoisse de La Nativité de la Sainte-Vierge — C$16,680 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetOpération boîte à chaussures pour réfugiés — C$7,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMaison d'hébergement L'Égide — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetS.A.S. Soutien Autisme Soutien — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMaison de la Famille Kateri — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetColl`ege Champlain — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLa Traversée — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNouvel Envol de Vie — C$1,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetCentre de femmes L'Éclaircie — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMaison du Père — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChez Doris — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Old Brewery — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Source Bleue — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation St-HubertJewish Community Foun…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC8.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation St-Hubert · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 809087869:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Corne d'abondance de Candiac’s filings →