Consort, AB · Charitable organization
Consort Pastoral Charge
We are a religious organization that ministers to the spiritual needs of the community and provides a church for worship services and a social outreach for the community.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Church of Canada-M & S | C$2,695 |
| Consort School Pantry | C$500 |
| Bissel Centre | C$500 |
| Salvation Army- National | C$500 |
| Hardisty Lake Camp | C$400 |
| A.D.R.A. | C$400 |
| Alberta N.W. conference | C$60 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$560 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA-MISSION & SERVICE4× · 2017–2020 · C$16k · revenue +22%
- BCBissel Centre4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +128%
- SASalvation Army-National4× · 2017–2020 · C$2k · revenue +936%
Funded once
- CFConsort Food Pantryone grant, 2019 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.