Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Conseil Des Relations Internationales de Montreal (Corim)
Déjeuners-causeries colloques visioconférences le conseil des relations internationales de montréal a pour mission de favoriser une plus grande connaisance des questions internationales et de susciter une collaboration plus étroite entre les divers milieux montréalais impliqués dans les affaires internationales.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONSEIL DES ARTS DE MONTRÉAL | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UDUNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL4× · 2017–2021 · C$11k · revenue +31%
- UDUniversité de Montréal3× · 2017–2021 · C$10k · revenue +38%
- CDCONSEIL DES ARTS DE MONTRÉAL3× · 2022–2024 · C$8k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- UDUNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉALone grant, 2018 · C$12k
- MSMÉDECINS SANS FRONTIÈRESgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +46%
- OQOXFAM - QUÉBECone grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enseignement et recherche universitaire
Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…
Enseignement secondaire privé
Travaux d'analyse et de rédactions et publications des études scientifiques
Institution universitaire dont la mission est l'enseignement et la recherche
Soins médicaux spécialisés en cardiologie
Enseignement universitaire développement d'activité de recherche
Université d'ingénierie distribution de bourses d'études aux étudiants développement de la recherche dans le domaine du génie projets de développement international dans le domaine du génie
Activités de recherche scientifique et d'enseignement de 2e et 3e cycle
Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is UniversitÉ Du QuÉBec À MontrÉAl and the most unlike its peers is Dialogue sciences et politiques. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.