Pointe-Aux-Trembles, QC · Charitable organization
Congregation Des Oblats de la Vierge Marie
1)retraite 2) accueil de groupe 3) ministères 4) activités pastorales pour jeunes
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LE VERBE MÉDIAS | C$515 |
| L'ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN DE MONTRÉAL | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LVLE VERBE MÉDIAS4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +129%
- ACARCHIEPISCOPALE CATHOLIQUE ROMAINE DE MONTR 4AL3× · 2017–2019 · C$2k · revenue +36%
- RVRADIO VILLE-MARIE2× · 2022–2023 · C$400 · revenue +101%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHURCH OF MONTREALgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue ×45
- SDSANCTUAIRE DU SACRE COEUR ET DE SAINT-PADRE PIOone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +14%
- LCLÈINFORMATEUR CATHOLIQUEone grant, 2018 · C$250
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Detention d'un immeuble faisant partie du patrimone religieux immeuble faisant partie du patrimone religieux; immeuble principalement occupé par les fraternités monastiques de jérusalem (communautés religeuses)
Église de la religion catholique romaine et soutient à la communauté
Culte de la religion catholique
Culte et pastorale catholique romain
Assurer le culte catholique romain sur le territoire déterminé par l'évêque de gaspé
Promotion de la religion catholique romaine
Promouvoir l'avancement de la religion catholique romaine. administrer les biens servant au culte et ppouvoir à l'ensevelissement des défunts.
Église catholique romaine
Église catholique romaine
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
Administrer des biens pour l'exercice de la religion catholique romaine.
Administrer des biens de la fabrique sur un territoire érigé en paroisse pour des fins de religion catholique romaine au profit des fidèles de cette religion. assurer l'évangélisation le culte et les sacrements promouvoir la pratique de la…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation Archiepiscopale Catholique Romaine De Montreal and the most unlike its peers is Le Verbe médias. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FABRIQUE ST-ENFANT JÉSUS ↗
- Who funds LE VERBE MÉDIAS ↗
- Who funds ARCHIEPISCOPALE CATHOLIQUE ROMAINE DE MONTR 4AL ↗
- Who funds DÉVELOPPEMENT ET PAIX ↗
- Who funds SEL ET LUMIÈRE CANADA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHURCH OF MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds L'ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN DE MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds SANCTUAIRE DU SACRE COEUR ET DE SAINT-PADRE PIO ↗
- Who funds RADIO VILLE-MARIE ↗
- Who funds ALPHA MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds GRAND SÉMINIAIRE DE MONTRÉAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.