Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Community Funds for Families and Children

To recieve and maintain a fund or funds to apply all or part of the principal and income for charitable purposes of providing financial assistance to families & persons in need to obtain - remedial therapy and counselling - basic necessities of life - assistance with medical emergencies or conditions

C$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$1,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$634k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIKUR CHOLIMC$12,700
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$9,600
MAAYANOSC$1,500
MACHZIKEI TORAHC$500
BAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILLC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$77k · 3 repeat orgsC$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

C$77k
C$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$39k · revenue +8%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$34k · revenue +68%
  • SS
    SOCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY MATTERS FUND
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • HA
    HALACHIC ACADEMY RAVADgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +191%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE MILTON EISNER YESHIVA OF SCRANTON PE
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue -96%
  • BO
    BROTHERS OF MERCY
    one grant, 2019 · C$18k · revenue -33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
4
Bais Chomesh High School for Girls

The Charity operates an orthodox Jewish high school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the Jewish faith as well as general academic studies. The Charity carries on edu- cational programs to provide teachers…

—
5
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
6
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
7
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
8
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—
9
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
10
The Bnei Akiva Bayit

Charity raises funds to maintain religious services and makes donations to other charities and causes

—
11
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
12
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Baycrest Day Care Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$39,070 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$34,047 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHALACHIC ACADEMY RAVAD — C$20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE MILTON EISNER YESHIVA OF SCRANTON PE — C$20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBROTHERS OF MERCY — C$18,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBAYCREST HOSPITAL — C$17,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY MATTERS FUND — C$3,960 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBAYCREST — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON YAKOV ZEV — C$2,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAYCREST DAY CARE CENTRE — C$2,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF TORONTO — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARING KINDNESS — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMAAYANOS — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSINAI CHILD CARE SERVICES — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL — C$900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHOMER SHABBOS CHEVRA MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACHZIKEI TORAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA BNEI TZION OF TORONTO — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETH CHABAD ISRAELI COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable Foun…The Chaim Moshe Fried…Moral Arc FoundationFieldgate Cares Found…The F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…J & H Feldman Charita…Jack and Doris Bistri…The George Hofstedter…The Friedberg Charita…Rayjo Charitable Trust479 Foundation
Zolty Charitable FoundationON15.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · 479 Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 852194398:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Community Funds for Families and Children’s filings →