St-Théophile, QC · Charitable organization
Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Theophile 7691
Don communauté (tel fabrique service de garde don recherche sur maladie service fin devie religion
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FABRIQUE ST THEOPHILE | C$500 |
| FONDATION SANTE BEAUCE-ETCHEMIN | C$300 |
| RELAIS POUR LAVIE DE BEAUCE | C$200 |
| FONDATION MOISSON BEAULE | C$200 |
| FONDATION CATHRINE DE LONGPRÉ | C$200 |
| FONDATION MIRA | C$100 |
| FONDATION DU COEUR BEAUCE ETCHEMIN | C$100 |
| FONDATION DU COEUR BEAUCE ETCHEMIN | C$38 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$800 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FMFONDATION MOISSON BEAULE6× · 2017–2024 · C$660 · revenue +39%
- FMFONDATION MIRA4× · 2017–2020 · C$360 · revenue +42%
- FCFONDATION COEUR BEAUCE-ETCHEMIN4× · 2017–2024 · C$323 · revenue +84%
Funded once
- SGSERVICE GARDE (ST-THÉOPHILE)one grant, 2020 · C$240
- SCSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +39%
- MCMAISON CATHERINE DE LONPRÉone grant, 2020 · C$100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aucune collecte de fonds. nous avons fait un don de nos avoir à un organisme de bienfaisance reconnu
Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Soutien à l'acquisition d'équipement médical pour le centre de santé et de services sociaux des basques.
Venir en aide aux personnes démunies et vulnérables confrontées à des problèmes de sécurité alimentaire
Encourager soutenir et améliorer les soins et le développement de la techologie de l'hôpital pierre-boucher.
La fondation a été constituée dans le but de remettre des fonds à des donataires reconnus aux fins de la loi de l'impôt afin de contribuer au soulagement de la pauvreté à l'avancement de l'éducation et à d'autres fins profitant à la…
A pour but de contribuer à l'avancement de l'éducation par la fourniture de locaux à l'école d'entrepreneurship de beauce au plus bas coût possible afin que celle-ci puisse exercer ses activités éducatives.
1) défendre et promouvoir les intérêts des personnes handicapées 2) assurer leur bien-être physique et matériel 3) se procurer aux fins mentionnées ci-dessus des fonds ou autres biens par voie de souscription publique
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Santé Beauce-Etchemin and the most unlike its peers is Moisson Beauce Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.