Skip to content
Canadian charities

Levis, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St Romauld 2981

Voir annexe ci-jointe

C$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$450
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE ST-JEAN L'ÉVANGILISTEC$12,600
CORPS DE CADETS 2820 CHARNYC$450
ADOBERGEC$450
MAISON DES JEUNES ST-JEAN-CHRYSOSTOMESC$450
LA JONCTION POUR ELLESC$450
SECOURS MISSIONC$450
MAISON DE LA FAMILLEC$450
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$31k · 8 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

C$31k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$900 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FABRIQUE ST-JEAN L'ÉVANGILISTE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$16k · revenue +38%
  • LJ
    LA JONCTION POUR ELLES
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +121%
  • MD
    MAISON DE LA FAMILLE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • FS
    FABRIQUE ST-JEAN L'ÉVANGILISTE
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k
  • MD
    MAISON DES JEUNES ST-JEAN-CHRYSOSTOMES
    one grant, 2023 · C$400
  • A
    ADOBERGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$400

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maison Des Jeunes L'authentique
—
2
Maison D'hebergement Jeunesse Roland-Gauvreau
—
3
Loge M'entraide
—
4
L'entraide Chez Nous

Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile

—
5
Maison Des Jeunes Le Jouvenceau

Fournir aux jeunes un endroit pour se divertir dans le secteur de dolbeau-mistassini

—
6
Defis-Jeunesse Sept-Iles
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
8
Assemblee Chretienne De Jonquiere
—
9
Escouade Pour L'enfance
—
10
La Maison Des Jeunes Au Coeur Des Montagnes

Maison des jeunes

—
11
Maison D'ÉDition Paulines
—
12
Maison Des Jeunes De Labrecque

Tenir et animer un lieu de rencontre pour les jeunes.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Maison Des Jeunes De St-Jean-Chrysostome Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Contact-Ainés. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE ST-JEAN L'ÉVANGILISTE — C$15,970 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSECOURS MISSION — C$2,650 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLA JONCTION POUR ELLES — C$2,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE — C$2,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORPS DE CADETS 2820 CHARNY — C$2,550 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSERVICE D'ENTRAIDE ST-ROMUALD — C$2,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJUVÉNAT NOTRE-DAME — C$2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONTACT-AINÉ — C$530 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES ST-JEAN-CHRYSOSTOMES — C$450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADOBERGE — C$450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Contact-Ainé — C$320 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FABRIQUE ST-JEAN L'ÉVANGILISTE ↗
  • Who funds SECOURS MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LA JONCTION POUR ELLES ↗
  • Who funds MAISON DE LA FAMILLE ↗
  • Who funds CORPS DE CADETS 2820 CHARNY ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE D'ENTRAIDE ST-ROMUALD ↗
  • Who funds JUVÉNAT NOTRE-DAME ↗
  • Who funds CONTACT-AINÉ ↗
  • Who funds MAISON DES JEUNES ST-JEAN-CHRYSOSTOMES ↗
  • Who funds ADOBERGE ↗
  • Who funds Fondation Contact-Ainé ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

L'Archevêque catholiq…Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Maurice Tan…Fondation Québec Phil…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
L'Archevêque catholique romain de QuébecQC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: L'Archevêque catholique romain de Québec · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 886308196:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St Romauld 2981’s filings →