Skip to content
Canadian charities

St-Pascal, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Pascal No 2941

Dons à divers organismes sans but lucratif qui ont pour objectif le soulagement de la pauvreté l'avancement de la religion et l'avancement de l'éducation

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$500
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLE ST-PASCAL (COMITÉ ACCUEIL-PARTAGE)C$500
FONDATION OLOC$300
FONDATION ANDRÉ CÔTÉC$200
FABRIQUE DE SAINT-PASCALC$200
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE KAMOURASKAC$200
Individual grant recipientC$200
L'ARC-EN-CIEL-DU-COEURC$100
FONDATION DE LA SCLEROSE EN PLAQUEC$100
FABRIQUE SAINTE-HÉLÈNE DE KAMOURASKAC$100
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-BRUNOC$100
ÉCOLE SECONDAIRE CHAMOINE-BEAUDETC$100
CROIX ROUGE CANADIENNEC$100
CENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDEC$100
Individual grant recipientC$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 76% of grant dollars (C$9k). The 24% that went abroad (C$3k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 24% of all-years giving (C$3k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$10k · 18 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

C$10k
C$725

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+273%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$900 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FONDATION OLO
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$1k · revenue +41%
  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE SAINT-PASCAL
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$1k · revenue +47%
  • FS
    FABRIQUE SAINT-LOUIS DE KAMOURASKA
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$600 · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • VS
    VILLE ST-PASCAL (COMITÉ ACCEUIL-PARTAGE)
    one grant, 2022 · C$500
  • VS
    VILLE SAINT PASCAL (COMITÉ D'ENVIRONNEMTN SAINT-PACAL)
    one grant, 2022 · C$100
  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE SAINT-DENISgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue +273%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Louis-De-France

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Pacome

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Christophe

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Sacre-Coeur

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Catherine-De-Sienne

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Andre-De-La-Sarre

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jacques-Le-Majeur

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Aubert

Exercice de la religion catholique

—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Andre

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine.

—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Barnabe

Exercice de religion catholique

—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Alexandre

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-Liesse

Exercice de la religion catholique romaine

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Joseph-De-Kamouraska and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Olo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION OLO — C$1,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SAINT-PASCAL — C$1,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON PALIATIFS DESJARDINS — C$1,010 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION ANDRÉ CÔTÉ — C$950 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFABRIQUE SAINT-LOUIS DE KAMOURASKA — C$600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITÉ DOMRÉMY VILLE ST-PASCAL — C$520 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFONDATION DE LA SCLEROSE EN PLAQUE — C$500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFABRIQUE DE PAROISSE DE ST-BRUNO — C$400 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE SAINTE-HÉLÈNE DE KAMOURASKA — C$315 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE — C$300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetL'ARC-EN-CIEL-DU-COEUR — C$215 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SAINT-PHILIPPE-DE-NÉRI — C$200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAPKH INC — C$150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SAINT-DENIS — C$100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFABRIQUE ST-JOSEPH — C$25 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC9.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 890590193:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Pascal No 2941’s filings →