Skip to content

Saint-Jean-De-Matha, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Jean de Matha 7

Aides et services destinés au secteur de la bienfaisance

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$39
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION QUÉBECOISE DU CANCERC$1,000
Individual grant recipientC$450
RELAIS POUR LA VIE SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$400
SCOUT ST-JEAN DE MATHAC$250
SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUEC$200
CENTREAIDE LANAUDIEREC$200
MIRA FONDATIONC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$15k · 11 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

C$15k
C$788

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+44%

Still filing today

73%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FQ
    FONDATIONS QUEBECOISE DU CANCER
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$5k · revenue +91%
  • MF
    MIRA FONDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +42%
  • LS
    LA SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE LANAUDIÈRE
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$800 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • LR
    LES RÉPITS DE GABYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$288 · revenue +44%
  • FS
    FADOQ ST-JEAN-DE-MATHA
    one grant, 2023 · C$250
  • DD
    DIABÈTIQUES DE LANAUDIÈREgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$200 · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Lanaudière
—
2
La société alzheimer des Laurentides
—
3
Centraide Laurentides
—
4
Aide Grossesse Quebec
—
5
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
6
Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services sociaux de Laval
—
7
Santé mentale Québec / Haut-Richelieu
—
8
Autisme - Centre Du QuÉBec

Défendre les droits des personnes présentant des troubles envahissants du développement et promouvoir à tous les niveaux les services adaptés et adéquats pour ces personnes et leur famille

—
9
Cancer-Aide Lanaudière

Son objectif est de fournir une aide aux personnes atteintes de cancer et à leurs proches ainsi que fournir des informations à ces mêmes personnes.

—
10
Les Diabetiques Du Nord De Montreal Inc.
—
11
Association De L'acidose Lactique Du Saguenay - Lac-Saint-Jean

Recherche afin de trouver u traitement efficace contre la maladie de l'acidose lactique.

—
12
Association sclérose en plaques rive-sud
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diabétiques de Lanaudière Inc. and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Trinite. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATIONS QUEBECOISE DU CANCER — C$5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE STE-TRINITÉ — C$4,600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMIRA FONDATION — C$1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIBROSE KYSTIQUE — C$800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE LANAUDIÈRE — C$800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation Sclerose En Plaques — C$750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMAISON GROS ORTEILS — C$400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAIDE LANAUDIERE — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLES RÉPITS DE GABY — C$288 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAccueil Jeunesse Lanaudiere — C$200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIABÈTIQUES DE LANAUDIÈRE — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouper de la Solidarite — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FONDATIONS QUEBECOISE DU CANCER ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE STE-TRINITÉ ↗
  • Who funds MIRA FONDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIBROSE KYSTIQUE ↗
  • Who funds LA SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DE LANAUDIÈRE ↗
  • Who funds Association Sclerose En Plaques ↗
  • Who funds MAISON GROS ORTEILS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAIDE LANAUDIERE ↗
  • Who funds LES RÉPITS DE GABY ↗
  • Who funds Accueil Jeunesse Lanaudiere ↗
  • Who funds DIABÈTIQUES DE LANAUDIÈRE ↗
  • Who funds Souper de la Solidarite ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'OntarioON4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 893293969:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Jean de Matha 7’s filings →