Saint-Ferdinand, QC · Charitable organization
Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Ferdinand No91
Assemblées générales rencontre avec d'autres organismes participation aux activités de la municipalité
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER | C$500 |
| CLDI | C$450 |
| PAROISSE ST JEAN MARIE VANNEY | C$300 |
| MAISON DES JEUNES LA TRAVERSÉE | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$800 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCLDI2× · 2018–2023 · C$900 · revenue +29%
- CDCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE L'ÉRABLE2× · 2019–2022 · C$800 · revenue +75%
- SCSOCIÉTÉ CDNE CANCER2× · 2017–2018 · C$558 · revenue +6%
Funded once
- LVLA VOLTE-FACEone grant, 2022 · C$725 · revenue +7%
- CDCentre d'Action Bénévole de l'Érableone grant, 2017 · C$500
- FSFABRIQUE ST FERDINANDone grant, 2019 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches
Aide soutien recherche visant le bien-être physique et psychologique et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie des personnes ayant subi un AVC et leurs proches.
Centre de prévention du suicide
Aide aux jeunes toxicomanes
Recherche sur les indices de souffrance numérique publication de texte de sensibilisation sur les problèmes de santé mentale
L'organisme offre de l'hébergement à loyer modique pour les femmes enceintes ou monoparentales à faible revenu ainsi que des services d'aide connexes.
Offrir un environnement de soutien aux femmes dans des situations de crises et de vulnérabilité.
Faire de l'animation de groupe d'entreaide pour les perssones souffrant de trouves anxieux
Responsabilité du développement de la coordination et de l'exécution des activités de recherche pouvant contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs de la loi sur la santé et la sécurité du travail et plus précisément à l'identification et à…
L'organisme favorise l'autonomie des femmes en leur fournissant des moyens des services du support et du suivi.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre D'action Benevole De L'erable and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Marie-Vianney. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLDI ↗
- Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE L'ÉRABLE ↗
- Who funds LA VOLTE-FACE ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CDNE CANCER ↗
- Who funds PRÉRENTION SUICIDE ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
- Who funds ORAPE ↗
- Who funds PAROISSE ST JEAN MARIE VANNEY ↗
- Who funds CROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE ↗
- Who funds LA TRAVERSÉ 12-18 ↗
- Who funds Fédération Québécoise de l'Autisme ↗
- Who funds O RIVAGE ↗
- Who funds Ass. de La Fibromialgie ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.