Skip to content

Saint-Ferdinand, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Ferdinand No91

Assemblées générales rencontre avec d'autres organismes participation aux activités de la municipalité

C$1k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$500
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$450
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$500
CLDIC$450
PAROISSE ST JEAN MARIE VANNEYC$300
MAISON DES JEUNES LA TRAVERSÉEC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$9k · 10 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

C$9k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+41%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CLDI
    2× · 2018–2023 · C$900 · revenue +29%
  • CD
    CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE L'ÉRABLE
    2× · 2019–2022 · C$800 · revenue +75%
  • SC
    SOCIÉTÉ CDNE CANCER
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$558 · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • LV
    LA VOLTE-FACE
    one grant, 2022 · C$725 · revenue +7%
  • CD
    Centre d'Action Bénévole de l'Érable
    one grant, 2017 · C$500
  • FS
    FABRIQUE ST FERDINAND
    one grant, 2019 · C$500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
2
Fondation ArtÈRe

Aide soutien recherche visant le bien-être physique et psychologique et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie des personnes ayant subi un AVC et leurs proches.

—
3
La Traversée centre de crise et de prévention du suicide

Centre de prévention du suicide

—
4
Le centre Action Benevole DEs Sources
—
5
La Maison Arc-En-Ciel

Aide aux jeunes toxicomanes

—
6
Survivre

Recherche sur les indices de souffrance numérique publication de texte de sensibilisation sur les problèmes de santé mentale

—
7
Cap Jem

L'organisme offre de l'hébergement à loyer modique pour les femmes enceintes ou monoparentales à faible revenu ainsi que des services d'aide connexes.

—
8
Centre espoir Sophie (Ces)

Offrir un environnement de soutien aux femmes dans des situations de crises et de vulnérabilité.

—
9
Ateliers je suis capable
—
10
Le Versant RÉSeau D'entraide Pour Les Personnes Souffrant De Troublesanxieux

Faire de l'animation de groupe d'entreaide pour les perssones souffrant de trouves anxieux

—
11
Institut De Recherche Robert Sauve En Sante Et En Securite Du Travail

Responsabilité du développement de la coordination et de l'exécution des activités de recherche pouvant contribuer à la réalisation des objectifs de la loi sur la santé et la sécurité du travail et plus précisément à l'identification et à…

—
12
Centre Le Volet Des Femmes

L'organisme favorise l'autonomie des femmes en leur fournissant des moyens des services du support et du suivi.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre D'action Benevole De L'erable and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Marie-Vianney. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLDI — C$900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE L'ÉRABLE — C$800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLA VOLTE-FACE — C$725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CDNE CANCER — C$558 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRÉRENTION SUICIDE — C$549 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORAPE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAROISSE ST JEAN MARIE VANNEY — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA TRAVERSÉ 12-18 — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFédération Québécoise de l'Autisme — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetO RIVAGE — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAss. de La Fibromialgie — C$100 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLDI ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE DE L'ÉRABLE ↗
  • Who funds LA VOLTE-FACE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CDNE CANCER ↗
  • Who funds PRÉRENTION SUICIDE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ORAPE ↗
  • Who funds PAROISSE ST JEAN MARIE VANNEY ↗
  • Who funds CROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE ↗
  • Who funds LA TRAVERSÉ 12-18 ↗
  • Who funds Fédération Québécoise de l'Autisme ↗
  • Who funds O RIVAGE ↗
  • Who funds Ass. de La Fibromialgie ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON1.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 888110442:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Ferdinand No91’s filings →