Skip to content
Canadian charities

St Chrysostome, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St Chrysostome 358

Support financier à des oeuvres locales et régionales

C$440
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$240
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$40
Median grant
2
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORPORATION ÉPISCOPALE DE VALLEYFIELDC$240
SOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCERC$60
DAMES AUXILIAIRES HOPITAL BARRIE MEMORIALC$40
FONDATION MIRA INCC$40
COEUR AVCC$40
INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTREALC$20
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 81% of grant dollars (C$54k). The 19% that went abroad (C$12k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 19% of all-years giving (C$12k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$28k · 21 repeat orgsC$38k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
55

Total granted

C$28k
C$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+101%

Still filing today

67%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    LEUCAN
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$12k · revenue +10%
  • CÉ
    CORPORATION ÉPICAPALE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +72%
  • SC
    SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FD
    FAMILLES DEMMERMIES (PANIER DE NOEL)
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k
  • FD
    FAMILLE DÉMUNIES (PANIER DE NOËL)
    one grant, 2019 · C$7k
  • FD
    FAMILLES DÉMNUNIES PANIERS DE NOEL
    one grant, 2020 · C$7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
3
Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

—
4
Fondation Hôtel-Dieu de Sorel

Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est

—
5
La Fondation Santé
—
6
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
7
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire De Cardiologie Et De Pneumologie De QuÉBec

La fondation a pour objectif de percevoir les dons de gérer les fonds au profit de l'institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de québec - université laval.

—
8
Fondation Jacques-de Champlain

Accès à la défibrilation recherche cardiovasculaire

—
9
Fondation Des BÉNÉFiciaires Des Chsld Pierre-De Saurel

Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est

—
10
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
11
Fondation De L'hotel-Dieu De Montmagny

Promouvoir encourager et soutenir les oeuvres hospitalières scientifiques et humanitaires poursuivies par l'hôpital de montmagny

—
12
Fondation Mon Étoile pour le financement de la recherche curative du cancer
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Les Toits D'ÉMile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEUCAN — C$11,585 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION ÉPICAPALE — C$2,860 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$2,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE PADRE-PIO — C$1,970 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETÉ ST JEAN. BAPTISTE — C$810 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFONDATION DES MALADIES DU COEUR — C$560 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MIRA — C$420 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPITAL ANNA LABERGE (FONDATION) — C$320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEFI PIERRE SVENOIE — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF DE MONTRÉAL — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON LA SOURCE BLEUE — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAMES AUXILIAIRES HOPITAL D'ORMSTOWN — C$265 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLes Capucino du Quebec — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLes Toits d'Emile — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Hopital Barrie Mémorial — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER — C$120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE — C$120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARREFOUR INTERVOCATIONEL — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEUCAN ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION ÉPICAPALE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE PADRE-PIO ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETÉ ST JEAN. BAPTISTE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DES MALADIES DU COEUR ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION MIRA ↗
  • Who funds HOPITAL ANNA LABERGE (FONDATION) ↗
  • Who funds DEFI PIERRE SVENOIE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF DE MONTRÉAL ↗
  • Who funds MAISON LA SOURCE BLEUE ↗
  • Who funds DAMES AUXILIAIRES HOPITAL D'ORMSTOWN ↗
  • Who funds Les Capucino du Quebec ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Jewish Community Foun…La Fondation du Grand…Conam Charitable Foun…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way East Ontar…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC8.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Conam Charitable Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 892589441:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St Chrysostome 358’s filings →