Skip to content
Canadian charities

St-Cesaire, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Cesaire 2172

Bénévolat auprès de l'église et de la communauté

C$10k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$55
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLEC$9,500
ENFANTS DE L'OPÉRAC$200
PGOC$104
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$37k · 5 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +119% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$37k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE
    4× · 2019–2023 · C$29k · revenue +119%
  • PS
    PAROISSE ST- CÉSAIRE
    2× · 2020–2022 · C$2k · revenue +144%
  • MD
    MAISON DES JEUNES DES 4 LIEUX
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$1k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AP
    ASSOCIATION PULMONAIRE DU QUÉBECgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$800 · revenue +41%
  • SD
    SOCIÉTÉ D'HISTOIRE ET GÉNÉALOGIE DES 4 LIEUX
    one grant, 2020 · C$200 · revenue -53%
  • FH
    FONDATION HÔPITAL HORÉ- MERCIERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Sauveur
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Edouard
—
10
Maison Des Jeunes L'authentique
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antonin
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Royaume
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre D'action Benevole De Saint-Cesaire and the most unlike its peers is SociÉTÉ D'histoire Et De GÉNÉAlogie Des Quatre Lieux. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOLE — C$28,984 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetÉCOLE SECONDAIRE PGO — C$3,648 over 4y, 34% of budgetPAROISSE ST- CÉSAIRE — C$1,750 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES DES 4 LIEUX — C$1,450 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetENFANTS DE L'OPÉRA — C$1,200 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetASSOCIATION PULMONAIRE DU QUÉBEC — C$800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ D'HISTOIRE ET GÉNÉALOGIE DES 4 LIEUX — C$200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION HÔPITAL HORÉ- MERCIER — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLES DIABÉTIQUE HAUTE-YAMASKA — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 889216438:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil St-Cesaire 2172’s filings →