Skip to content

Lemoyne, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Santa Maria N 2267

Le soulagement de la pauvreté l'avancement de la religion.

C$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$41k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
C$2,200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSEIL 9741 BROSSARDC$19,744
OLYMPIQUES SPÉCIAUX VALLÉE DU RICHELIEUC$7,535
COMITÉ ACTION POPULAIRE LEMOYNE (CPAL)C$7,180
COMITÉ ACTION POPULAIRE LEMOYNE (LE FRIGO DU COIN)C$7,000
PREMIERS PAS CHAMPLAINC$3,000
LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE LEMOYNEC$3,000
Individual grant recipientC$2,660
MAISON VICTOR-GADBOISC$2,200
FONDATION SOURCE BLEUEC$2,200
LA MOSAIQUEC$2,000
LA VIGI RIVE-SUDC$2,000
L'ENVOLC$1,000
ASSOCIATION DES BÉNÉVOLES CHSLD VIGI MONTÉRÉGIEC$700
PAROISSE SAINT-JEAN XXIIIC$620
FONDAITON MIRA INC.C$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$28k · 13 repeat orgsC$46k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
19

Total granted

C$28k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+79%

Still filing today

69%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OLYMPIQUES SPÉCIAUX VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$8k · revenue +37%
  • PP
    PREMIERS PAS CHAMPLAIN
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +100%
  • LM
    LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE LEMOYNE
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$4k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • ÉL
    ÉCOLE LAJEUNESSE (HABILLEMENT D'ENFANTS VÊTEMENTS)
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$830
  • CD
    CENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE EN COMMUNAUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$446 · revenue +214%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survivre

Recherche sur les indices de souffrance numérique publication de texte de sensibilisation sur les problèmes de santé mentale

—
2
Tel-Aide RÉGion Du SuroÎT

L'organisme a pour objectif d'offrir un service d'assistance téléphonique anonyme et confidentielle ainsi qu'une présence réceptive à toute peronne aux prises avec des difficultés d'ordre physiologique psychologique morale sociale…

—
3
Sidalys

Hébergement et soutien psychosocial des personnes vivant avec le vih une autre itss ou a risque de vivre avec pouvant présenter des enjeux de consommations et de dépendances et/ou de santé mentale

—
4
Le Quartier Des Femmes

Services d'écoute et de soutien partage d'information juridique et de soutien à domicile.

—
5
Carrefour Familial Des Personnes Handicapees

Création d'un lieu d'apprentenance activités de dév. du paivoir d'agir par l'éducation populaire soutien à la défense des droits intervention individuelles briser l'isolement sensibilisation des milieux.

—
6
La Maison Jean-Monbourquette

La maison jean-monbourquette offre une plateforme en ligne proposant de nombreuses ressources d'aide et soutien pour les personnes endeuillées

—
7
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
8
Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
—
9
Maison Véro & Louis (Varennes)

Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes

—
10
La ChacuniÈRe

Développer logement social supervisé pour personnes déficience intellectuelle

—
11
Reseau D'accueil Des Agents Et Agentes De La Paix (La Vigile)

Recueillir les dons dans le but d'élaborer un plan thérapeutique afin de traiter les problématiques les plus courants vécues par les agents et agentes de la paix. héberger les personnes qui sont admises au centre et fournir des ressources…

—
12
Coup De Main Mauricie

Favoriser l'insertion socioprofessionnelle de personnes présentant une limitation motrice.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation la Mosaique and the most unlike its peers is Premiers Pas Champlain / Home Start Champlain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOLYMPIQUES SPÉCIAUX VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU — C$7,935 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPREMIERS PAS CHAMPLAIN — C$4,171 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE LEMOYNE — C$3,586 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION SOURCE BLEUE — C$3,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON VICTOR-GADBOIS — C$3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPAROISSE BIENHEUREUSE MARIE ROSE DUROCHER — C$2,008 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA MOSAIQUE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION DES BÉNÉVOLES CHSLD VIGI MONTÉRÉGIE — C$1,100 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetL'ENVOL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MIRA — C$750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE EN COMMUNAUTE — C$446 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALPHABÉTISATION IOTA (TVQLM) — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIOCÈSE SAINT JEAN-LONGUEUIL — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION HOPITAL CHARLES LEMOYNE — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPHASIE RIVE SUD — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget505 VIOLENCE CONJUGALE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION D'ILEOSTOMIE ET DE COLOSTOMIE DE MTL — C$100 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLYMPIQUES SPÉCIAUX VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU ↗
  • Who funds PREMIERS PAS CHAMPLAIN ↗
  • Who funds LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE LEMOYNE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION SOURCE BLEUE ↗
  • Who funds MAISON VICTOR-GADBOIS ↗
  • Who funds PAROISSE BIENHEUREUSE MARIE ROSE DUROCHER ↗
  • Who funds LA VIGI RIVE-SUD ↗
  • Who funds LA MOSAIQUE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION DES BÉNÉVOLES CHSLD VIGI MONTÉRÉGIE ↗
  • Who funds L'ENVOL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION MIRA ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE DE PEDIATRIE SOCIALE EN COMMUNAUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALPHABÉTISATION IOTA (TVQLM) ↗
  • Who funds DIOCÈSE SAINT JEAN-LONGUEUIL ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION HOPITAL CHARLES LEMOYNE ↗
  • Who funds APHASIE RIVE SUD ↗
  • Who funds 505 VIOLENCE CONJUGALE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION D'ILEOSTOMIE ET DE COLOSTOMIE DE MTL ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC10.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Filles de la Providence · Sjsh - District Du Canada · Les Soeurs Des Saints Noms de Jesus Et de Marie Du Quebec · Les Fiduciaires Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Club Richelieu St-Lambert · Fondation Famille Benoit · Fondation St-Hubert · Fonds Humanitaire de la Fraternite Des Policiers Et Policieres de Longueuil · Fondation Pilleniere Inc · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 889244174:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Santa Maria N 2267’s filings →