Skip to content

Trois-Rivieres, QC · Public foundation

Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil Notre-Dame du Cap Madeleine NO:2669

Aide de bienfaisances d'organismes reconnus

C$3k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$1,200
Individual grant recipientC$600
Individual grant recipientC$300
PARKINSONC$250
Individual grant recipientC$250
Individual grant recipientC$200
Individual grant recipientC$200
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$8k). The 17% that went abroad (C$2k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$2k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your field
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANCTUAIRE NOTRE DAME DU CAP — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION PULMONAIRE DU QUEBEC — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCab du Rivage — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Diose — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANCTUAIRE NOTRE DAME DU CAP ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION PULMONAIRE DU QUEBEC ↗
  • Who funds Cab du Rivage ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON ↗
  • Who funds Grand Diose ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 127447498:2022-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil Notre-Dame du Cap Madeleine NO:2669’s filings →