Skip to content
Canadian charities

Pabos, QC · Charitable organization

Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil MGR Ross Chandler 3261

Vente - Billet des Oeuvres Charitables

C$5k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$700
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$400
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$214
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
La Fabrique de la Paroisse de Saint-C ur-de-Marie de ChandleC$700
La Fabrique de la Paroisse de Sainte-Adelaide de PabosC$700
Fonds Michel Lancup IncC$600
Accroche-coeur centre de pédiatrie sociale en commun. GaspeC$500
La Maison d'Aide et d'Hébergement Blanche MorinC$400
Centre Émilie-GamelinC$400
Centre Pour Handicapés la Joie de Vivre de Chandler Inc.C$400
L'Association La Belle Vie Inc.C$300
Fondation du Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux du RocheC$300
Répit Pabok IncC$300
Comité des loisirs Villa PabosC$200
Club des 50 ans et plus de ChandlerC$200
Base plein air de BellefeuilleC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$17k · 11 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

C$17k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+62%

Still filing today

82%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$900 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE SAINTE-ADÉLAÏDE DE PABOS
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue +17%
  • CP
    CENTRE POUR HANDICAPÉS LA JOIE DE VIVRE DE CHANDLER INC.
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +53%
  • RP
    RÉPIT PABOK
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE CHANDLER
    one grant, 2019 · C$780
  • FS
    FABRIQUE SAINT-COEUR-DE-MARIE DE CHANDLERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$544 · revenue +62%
  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE STE-APÉLAIDE
    one grant, 2018 · C$300

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Base De Plein Air Bon Depart

Opérer une base de plein air pour personnes handicapées afin de leur faire vivre une expérience de vie de groupe au sein d'un milieu naturel. favoriser l'accessibilité des loisirs en offrant des services adaptés aux personnes handicapées.

—
2
Le Centre D'action Benevole De Gatineau

Promouvoir l'action bénévole auprès des aînés handicapées malades et enfants: -clinique d'impôt -accompagnement transport -livraison de popote roulante

—
3
Maison L'amie D'elle Inc

Héberger conseiller et aider les femmes vitimes de violenece conjugulate et leurs enfants.

—
4
La Maison soutien aux Aidants

Aider les aidants naturels et offrir des services de surveillance sécuritaire et de répit auprès des personnes dans le besoin.

—
5
Cap Jem

L'organisme offre de l'hébergement à loyer modique pour les femmes enceintes ou monoparentales à faible revenu ainsi que des services d'aide connexes.

—
6
Le P'tit Bonheur De Sablon

Accueil de jeunes pour des activités et plein-air en toutes saisons incluant l'hébergement et l'animation en favorisant l'accueil aux plus démunis de la société.

—
7
Sentier du nouveau jour

Aider accueillir héberger et dépanner des personnes aux prises avec des dépendances aux drogues à l’alcool ou aux médicaments.

—
8
Association De La Personne HandicapÉE De La Mrc D'antoine Labelle

Offrir de l'aide financière aux personnes handicapées à faible revenu de la mrc d'antoine-labelle pour des achats d'équipements spécialisés ou de tout autre besoin afin de maintenir une belle qualité de vie.

—
9
Centre D'action Benevole D'argenteuil

L'organisme exploite un établissement ayant pour but d'exercer une action volontaire autonome et bénévole prioritairement dans le domaine de la santé et des services sociaux. les principaux usagers de l'organisme sont d'une part les…

—
10
Le Module D'epanouissement a La Vie De Sept-Iles

Promouvoir et défendre les droits des personnes vivant avec un handicap

—
11
L'aide Aux Enfants Handicapes De Blainville Deux-Montagnes

Camps d'été

—
12
Entraide Rosemere

Fournitures de bons d'achats pour produit alimentaire et hygiene aux personnes défavorisées (as'de alimentaire) autres selims besoins distribution et achats panier de noël guignolie.) achats cadeaux enfant et aide personne handicapes.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre D'action Benevole Gascons-Perce Inc. and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Adelaide De Pabos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE DE SAINTE-ADÉLAÏDE DE PABOS — C$3,201 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRE POUR HANDICAPÉS LA JOIE DE VIVRE DE CHANDLER INC. — C$2,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRÉPIT PABOK — C$1,550 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetL'ASSOCIATION LA BELLE VIE INC. — C$1,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON BLANCHE MORIN — C$1,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFonds Michel Lancup Inc — C$1,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCentre Émilie-Gamelin — C$1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE ACTION BÉNÉVOLE — C$1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE HOSPITALIER DE CHANDLER — C$900 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFABRIQUE SAINT-COEUR-DE-MARIE DE CHANDLER — C$544 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetAccroche-coeur centre de pédiatrie sociale en commun. Gaspe — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBase plein air de Bellefeuille — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FABRIQUE DE SAINTE-ADÉLAÏDE DE PABOS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE POUR HANDICAPÉS LA JOIE DE VIVRE DE CHANDLER INC. ↗
  • Who funds RÉPIT PABOK ↗
  • Who funds L'ASSOCIATION LA BELLE VIE INC. ↗
  • Who funds MAISON BLANCHE MORIN ↗
  • Who funds Fonds Michel Lancup Inc ↗
  • Who funds Centre Émilie-Gamelin ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE ACTION BÉNÉVOLE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE CHANDLER ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE SAINT-COEUR-DE-MARIE DE CHANDLER ↗
  • Who funds Accroche-coeur centre de pédiatrie sociale en commun. Gaspe ↗
  • Who funds Base plein air de Bellefeuille ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Émilie-Tave…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation Émilie-Tavernier-GamelinQC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Émilie-Tavernier-Gamelin · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 891688244:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil MGR Ross Chandler 3261’s filings →