Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Chateau-Richer, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil la Visitation

Communauté chretienne de la paroise aide aux personnes domunios

C$2k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,564
Median grant
1
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE NOTRE-DAME DE LA NOUVELLE FRANCOC$1,564
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$8k · 3 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

C$8k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+99%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FABRIQUE CHÂTEAU-RICHER
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$6k · revenue +585%
  • FN
    FABRIQUE NOTRE DAME DU ROSAIRE
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$2k
  • SS
    SOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT-PAUL BOISCHATEL
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$400 · revenue -74%

Funded once

  • FQ
    Federation Québecoise de l'autismegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +117%
  • AI
    ASSOCIATION INTEGRATION SOCIALEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$700 · revenue +294%
  • JS
    JUMELAGE ST-FÉLIX INC
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue -37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Nativite-De-Jesus
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-L'annonciation
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Bon-Conseil
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Notre-Dame-Des-Neiges
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Royaume
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Baptiste-De-Nicolet
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Nicephore

Acquérir posséder et administrer des biens pour les fins de l'exercice de la religion catholique romaine dans la paroisse vu la desserte pour laquelle elle est formée.

—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Saint-Nom-De-Marie
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Saint-Rosaire and the most unlike its peers is Association Benevole Cote De Beaupre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE CHÂTEAU-RICHER — C$5,764 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFABRIQUE NOTRE DAME DU ROSAIRE — C$2,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFederation Québecoise de l'autisme — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASSOCIATION INTEGRATION SOCIALE — C$700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUMELAGE ST-FÉLIX INC — C$500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT-PAUL BOISCHATEL — C$400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOperation Enfants Soleil — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASS. BENEVOLE CÔTE DE BEAUPRÉ — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps Canadon
Canadahelps CanadonON2.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2021-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2021. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 891491342:2021-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil la Visitation’s filings →