Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Lac Au Saumon, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Des Lacs 10048

Distribution d'argent pour: fête de noël pour les enfants fête pour les personnes âgées et don à divers organimes (fabrique st-alexandre-des-lacs amirams de la vallée fabrique lac-au-saumon fabrique ste-florence myriam de la vallée sociéte d'alzheimer croix rouge canadienne les grands amis de la vallée la lueur d'espoir du bsl…

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$150
Median grant
—
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE DU LAC-AU-SAUMONC$1,660
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-LÉON-LE-GRANDC$520
SERVICE MYRIAM DE LA VALLÉEC$420
FABRIQUE DE STE-FLORENCEC$300
FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REINC$150
LA FONDATION MIRAC$150
LA LUEUR D'ESPOIR DU BSLC$150
LES GRANDS AMIS DE LA VALLÉEC$150
SCOIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA CROIX ROUGEC$150
SOCIÉTÉ D'ALZHEIMER DU BAS-SAINT-LAURENTC$150
LES AMIRAMS DE LA VALLÉEC$150
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$23k · 16 repeat orgsC$300 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

C$23k
C$300

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-LÉON-LE-GRAND
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +10%
  • AD
    AMIRAMS DE LA VALLÉE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +78%
  • LG
    LES GRANDS AMIS DE LA VALLÉE
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$700 · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER (RELAIS POUR LA VIE)
    one grant, 2021 · C$300 · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Angelique
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Sauveur
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Edouard
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Ambroise

Église catholique

—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Saint-Nom-De-Marie
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Service Myriam-De-La-Vallee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Cancer Society - SociÉTÉ Canadienne Du Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE DU LAC-AU-SAUMON — C$8,990 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetFABRIQUE ST ALEXANDRE DES LACS — C$2,870 over 7y, 33% of budgetFABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-LÉON-LE-GRAND — C$1,890 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSERVICE MYRIAM DE LA VALLÉE — C$1,270 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMIRAMS DE LA VALLÉE — C$1,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFABRIQUE DE STE-FLORENCE — C$776 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLES GRANDS AMIS DE LA VALLÉE — C$700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLA LUEUR D'ESPOIR DU BSL — C$650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCOIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA CROIX ROUGE — C$600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION MIRA — C$550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ D'ALZHEIMER DU BAS-SAINT-LAURENT — C$550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN — C$450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER (RELAIS POUR LA VIE) — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCHEVECHE DE RIMOUSKI — C$240 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FABRIQUE DU LAC-AU-SAUMON ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE ST ALEXANDRE DES LACS ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE ST-LÉON-LE-GRAND ↗
  • Who funds SERVICE MYRIAM DE LA VALLÉE ↗
  • Who funds AMIRAMS DE LA VALLÉE ↗
  • Who funds FABRIQUE DE STE-FLORENCE ↗
  • Who funds LES GRANDS AMIS DE LA VALLÉE ↗
  • Who funds LA LUEUR D'ESPOIR DU BSL ↗
  • Who funds SCOIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA CROIX ROUGE ↗
  • Who funds LA FONDATION MIRA ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ D'ALZHEIMER DU BAS-SAINT-LAURENT ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION CANADIENNE DU REIN ↗
  • Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER (RELAIS POUR LA VIE) ↗
  • Who funds ARCHEVECHE DE RIMOUSKI ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oeuvres Caritatives D…Union Canadienne des …PayPal Giving Fund Ca…
Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus CanadaQC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 886256197:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Des Lacs 10048’s filings →