Montreal-N, QC · Public foundation
Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables de L'Assemblee J Adrian Chabassol No: 2252
Raising funds in support of charitable works for our main church st.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AID TO THE CHURCH IN NEED | C$350 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -53% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCCAMP CARITAS3× · 2017–2019 · C$6k · revenue +14%
- SBSt. Brendan's Parish2× · 2017–2018 · C$5k
- ATAid To The Church In Need2× · 2017–2020 · C$850 · revenue +50%
Funded once
- MCMARIE CLARAC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · C$4k · revenue -53%
- TSTHE SIR MORTOMER B. DAVIS JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +50%
- CFCentre For Reproductive Lossone grant, 2017 · C$350 · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.