Skip to content

Terrebonne, QC · Charitable organization

Comité Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Bois-Des-Filion No 5661

Soutien la paroisse st-lac-aide les démunis de la paroisse st-maurice lorraire et sante caboini - aide l'école la ruché (tdh) - aide les jeunes cadets amien les scouts et les autre organisme qui nous en fond la demande - aide les oeuvres charitables des chevaliers de colomb du québec - aide le comité féminine de (l'état (de (- aide la…

C$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$14k
C$400
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIDE SERVICE ST-MAURICE NOUVRIRE LES FAMILLESC$14,000
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C QUEBEC INC COMITÉ FEMININE C DE CC$3,000
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C DON POUR LES JEUNESC$3,000
PAROISSE SAINT-LUC-AIDE-PRÊTE DE LA PAROISSEC$1,000
CENTRE D'AIDE ST-MAURICE HABEILLEMENT POUR ENFANTC$600
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C 5661 DON POUR ÉTUDEC$500
LE CHAÎNONC$500
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C566 DON R. CHARTRANDC$400
LA SOCIÉTÉ DE L'AUTISME ET DES TFD DE (AVA)C$400
Individual grant recipientC$400
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C QUÉBEC RALLYE MOTO FRATERNALC$200
OEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C 5661C$200
LA MISSION DES PETIT FRÈRES PERSONNES AÎNÉES SEULESC$100
CENTRE D'ACTION BÉNÉVOL SOLANGE -BEAUCHAMPC$100
CENTRE PRIE LE CARREFOURC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$118k · 14 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
23

Total granted

C$118k
C$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+35%

Still filing today

93%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SERVICE D'AIDE ST-MAURICE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$78k · revenue +58%
  • CA
    Comité Action Féminine de l'Étrat C de C
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +117%
  • EL
    ECOLE LE RUCHER
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$4k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • AA
    Action Autismegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +55%
  • AA
    Action Autisme
    one grant, 2018 · C$3k
  • SL
    Sclérose Latéral Amiotiquegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Lavalloise Pour La Deficience Intellectuelle Et Le Trouble Du Spectre De L'austisme (Aledia)

Favoriser et susciter le mainien l'amélioration et le développement de measures d'aide aux personnes vivant avec une déficience intellectuelle et/ou un trouble du spectre de l'autisme ainsi qu'à leur familles.

—
2
Autisme Mauricie

Nous offrons des services de soutien de formation et de diffusion des connaisances sur les troubles sévères du développement dont l'autisme aux parents et familles des gens touches par cette problématique.

—
3
Fondation Autisme Laurentides

Organisation d'activités de levées de fonds pour ramasser des fonds afin de les remettre à autisme laurentides.

—
4
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
5
Fondation Alain Lemaire
—
6
Autisme Laurentides

Écoute et soutenir les familles vivants avec une personne autiste. informer et ouvrir l'accès aux conférences et aux formations. organiser des activités de loisirs (les samedis et les camps de jour). fournir du répit aux familles (les…

—
7
Fondation Maurice-Lamarche S J

Chaute- jeunes

—
8
Fondation Déphia

L'organisme a pour objectif de receuillir des fonds essentiellement aux fins d'utilisation du cisss de chaudière appalaches pour les clientèle en déficience intellectuelle - trouble du spectre de l'autisme et déficience physique.

—
9
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
10
Autisme Montréal
—
11
Fondation Dr Julien

Assurer la promotion et la défense des droits des enfants en milieux défavorisés par la pédiatrie sociale.

—
12
Fondation Laure Gaudreault

La fondation amasse des fonds par le biais de souscriptions régulières et d'activités de financement. elle verse les sommes récoltées à des donataires reconnus qui respectent les buts de la fondaiton soit: aider financièrement les…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ComitÉ Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Bois-Des-Filion No 5661 and the most unlike its peers is T.R.O.P. Travail de réflexion pour des ondes pacifiques/P.E.a.C.E. Positive entertainment alternatives for children everywhere. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSERVICE D'AIDE ST-MAURICE — C$77,800 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetOEUVRE CHARITABLE C DE C DON POUR LES JEUNES — C$13,885 over 6y, 22% of budgetComité Action Féminine de l'Étrat C de C — C$4,646 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetECOLE LE RUCHER — C$4,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORPS CADETS AMIEN 2935 — C$4,140 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCOMITÉ FÉMININE CDEC — C$3,865 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION AIDE LORRAINE — C$3,500 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetAction Autisme — C$3,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCentre Marie Ève — C$2,300 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION MIRA INC. — C$1,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSclérose Latéral Amiotique — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOISSON LAURENTIDES — C$950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MARTIN MATTE — C$900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIOCESE DE ST JEROME — C$540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLE CHAÎNON — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUCAN INC — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA SOCIÉTÉ DE L'AUTISME ET DES TFD DE (AVA) — C$400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetProcure — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrésence Religieuse Intercommunautaire — C$350 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON QUÉBEC — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROUPE SCOUTS — C$200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASS D'LLEOSTOMIE ET COLOSTOMIE — C$200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRÉSOMI 21 — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORATOIRE ST-JOSEPH — C$200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA MISSION DES PETIT FRÈRES PERSONNES AÎNÉES SEULES — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetT.R.O.P.- P.E.A.C.E. — C$50 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation St-HubertQC12.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Fonds de Bienfaisance Des Employes de Montreal Bombardier Aeronautique · Fondation Mirella & Lino Saputo · Fondation J.A. Deseve · Fondation Luc Maurice · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Fasken Martineau Dumoulin /Fasken Martineau Dumoulin Foundation · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 886329390:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comité Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Bois-Des-Filion No 5661’s filings →