Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Longueuil, QC · Charitable organization

Collège Notre-Dame-De-Lourdes

Dispenser l'enseignement de niveau secondaire aux élèves tel que prescrit par le meq.

C$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$100
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPÉRATION PÉRE NOËLC$3,100
MAISON HINAINCC$2,000
ABRI DE LA RIVE-SUDC$315
FONDATION MAISON GILLES-CARLEC$180
PARTAGEC$165
ACDÉMIE DES ARTS TRAUVE TA VOIEC$105
FONDAITON LAJEMMERAISC$104
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$102
PARKINSON QUEBECC$100
FONDATION JEAN LAPOINTEC$100
FONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINEC$100
FONDS D'AICLE AUX ENFANTS DU CAMP MARISTEC$100
SERVICES DE CRISES DU CANADAC$52
ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF CANADAC$50
LE REFUGE LOBADANAKIC$45
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$630 · 3 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$630
C$340

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NATIVE WOMEN`S SHELTER OF MONTREAL
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$270 · revenue +56%
  • PC
    PROVISIONS COMMUNAUTAIRES
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$180 · revenue +29%
  • LR
    LE REFUGE LOBADONAKI
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$180 · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • FV
    FONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS
    one grant, 2023 · C$150 · revenue +2%
  • SD
    SOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +9%
  • CC
    CROIX-ROUGE CANADIENNE
    one grant, 2023 · C$90 · revenue -48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation Santé
—
2
Fondation Alain Lemaire
—
3
Fondation Amj-Js
—
4
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
5
Fondation Toxi-Co-GÎTes Denis Laventure
—
6
Fondation Santé de la Rouge

Le mandat de la fondation santé de la rouge est de développer avec la communauté des hautes-laurentides un partenariat qui lui permetta d'apporter aux intervenants les outils nécessaires pour offrir à la population de meilleurs soins…

—
7
Fondation Familiprix

Supporter diverses causes en lien avec la santé et le bien-être de la communauté.

—
8
Fondation Pour La SantÉ Sexuelle Et Affective Jean-Yves Desjardins
—
9
Fondation Les Amis De La Dauphinelle
—
10
Fondation Celine Daniel Et Laurent
—
11
La Fondation Jean Meloche /the Jean Meloche Foundation

Aide au développement de la relève de diverses disciplines et de centres d'excellence qui visent le soulagement de la souffrance ou de l'incapacité physique ou mentale.

—
12
Fondation ArtÈRe

Aide soutien recherche visant le bien-être physique et psychologique et l'amélioration de la qualité de vie des personnes ayant subi un AVC et leurs proches.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Maison Gilles Carle and the most unlike its peers is Le Refuge Lobadanaki. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
6/19
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAISON HINAINC — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABRI DE LA RIVE-SUD — C$315 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIVE WOMEN`S SHELTER OF MONTREAL — C$270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MAISON GILLES-CARLE — C$180 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROVISIONS COMMUNAUTAIRES — C$180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLE REFUGE LOBADONAKI — C$180 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION VÉRO & LOUIS — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACDÉMIE DES ARTS TRAUVE TA VOIE — C$105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDAITON LAJEMMERAIS — C$104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDS D'AICLE AUX ENFANTS DU CAMP MARISTE — C$100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARKINSON QUEBEC — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE RECHERCHE SUR LE CANCER — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION JEAN LAPOINTE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROIX-ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES DE CRISES DU CANADA — C$52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation St-HubertFondation Lise et Ric…Centraide Québec Cha…La Fondation du Grand…Centre Des Generation…Fondation Famille Ben…Fondation Philantra P…Fondation Laure Gaudr…Conam Charitable Foun…Raymond James Canada …Jewish Community Foun…
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC10.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation St-Hubert · Fondation Lise et Richard Fortin · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centre Des Generations de Boucherville · Fondation Famille Benoit · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · Conam Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 107508954:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Collège Notre-Dame-De-Lourdes’ filings →