Skip to content

Laval, QC · Charitable organization

College Letendre

Offre des programmes d'enseignement secondaire

C$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,269
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$112M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION DU CANCER DU SEINC$7,792
OPÉRATION ENFANT SOLEILC$3,813
FONDATION MIRAC$3,813
LEUCANC$3,660
LA FONDATION DU GRAND MONTRÉAL - DANS LA RUEC$3,269
FONDATION CHU STE-JUSTINEC$3,255
CROIX ROUGE CANADIENNEC$1,768
FONDATION DU CENTRE JEUNESSE DE LAVALC$1,200
CENTRE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DE LAVALC$300
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$115
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$90k · 21 repeat orgsC$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

C$90k
C$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

86%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRE DE BÉNÉVOLAT ET MOISSON LAVAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$10k · revenue +44%
  • FC
    FONDATION CHU STE-JUSTINE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$8k · revenue +55%
  • OE
    OPÉRATION ENFANT SOLEIL
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • GL
    GO LE GRAND DÉFI INC.
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -21%
  • LB
    LE BON DIEU DANS LA RUE ORGANISATION POUR JEUNES ADULTESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +68%
  • FA
    FONDATION ANDRÉ DELAMBRE
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
2
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
3
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
4
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
5
La Fondation Santé
—
6
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
7
Fondation santé bien-être de l'Est de Montréal

Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…

—
8
Fondation Santé de la Rouge

Le mandat de la fondation santé de la rouge est de développer avec la communauté des hautes-laurentides un partenariat qui lui permetta d'apporter aux intervenants les outils nécessaires pour offrir à la population de meilleurs soins…

—
9
Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

—
10
Fondation Epic

Soutenir la recherche et les services de prévention et de réadaptatio rendus par le centre épic de i'institut de cardiologie de montréal.

—
11
Fondation Du Diabete Laval Laurentides

Organiser des levées de fonds pour des activités dans le domaine du diabète. distribuer à d'autres organismes de même nature (diabète) des fonds. recevoir des dons legs testamentaires et autres contributions.

—
12
Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière

La fondation aspire par son engagement social à avoir un impact notable sur certains grands enjeux et contribuer directement au mieux-être de la population. la fondation établit donc des relations avec les institutions organisations et…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation du cancer du sein du Québec/Québec Breast Cancer Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Marie-Vincent. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DU CANCER DU SEIN — C$12,976 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE DE BÉNÉVOLAT ET MOISSON LAVAL — C$9,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHU STE-JUSTINE — C$7,948 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPÉRATION ENFANT SOLEIL — C$7,545 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEUCAN — C$7,240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION 24TH TREMBLANT — C$6,570 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetÉQUITERRE — C$6,499 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU DR. JULIEN — C$5,017 over 3y, 10% of budgetFONDATION MARIE-VINCENT — C$5,002 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MIRA — C$3,813 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLUB DES PETITS DÉJEUNERS DU CANADA — C$3,517 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE JEUNESSE DE LAVAL — C$3,414 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLA FONDATION DU GRAND MONTRÉAL - DANS LA RUE — C$3,269 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$3,234 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSociété canadienne de la sclérose en plaques — C$2,926 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGO LE GRAND DÉFI INC. — C$1,829 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLE BON DIEU DANS LA RUE ORGANISATION POUR JEUNES ADULTES — C$1,814 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$1,768 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION ANDRÉ DELAMBRE — C$1,702 over 1y, 100% of budgetFONDATION DU GRAND DÉFI PIERRE LAVOIE — C$1,660 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetASSOCIATION LAVALLOISE DE PARENTS ET AMIS POUR LE BIEN-ÊTRE — C$600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ DE ALZHEIMER LAVAL 1995 — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE PÉDIATRIE SOCIALE DE LAVAL — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSEIL RÉGIONAL DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DE LAVAL — C$400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRELAIS COMMUNAUTAIRE DE LAVAL — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIS Montréal — C$248 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE — C$176 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSLA QUÉBEC — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SANTA CABRINI — C$103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDiabète Québec — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER DU CANADA — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA SOCIÉTÉ D'ARTHRITE — C$75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater MontrealQC13.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Fondation Luc Maurice · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · Centre de services scolaire de Laval · Conam Charitable Foundation · Fondation Famille Benoit · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation St-Hubert

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 118892603:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on College Letendre’s filings →