Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Collège Lasalle / Lasalle College

Exploite un collège d'enseignement général professionnel commercial et spécialisé y compris les cours par correspondance

C$19k
Granted FY2020
3
Grants FY2020
—
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$5,755
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION LE CHAÎNONC$10,000
FONDATION LCI ÉDUCATIONC$5,755
FESTIVAL CLASSICAC$3,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$121k · 8 repeat orgsC$92k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

C$121k
C$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+34%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DU MUSÉE MCCORD
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$35k · revenue +109%
  • FL
    FONDATION LE CHAÎNON
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$31k · revenue +124%
  • FC
    FESTIVAL CLASSICA
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$18k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FD
    FONDATION DESJARDINSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$30k · revenue +255%
  • OM
    ORCHESTRE MÉTROPOLITAIN DE MONTRÉALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$17k · revenue +34%
  • MD
    MUSÉE DES BEAUX-ARTS DE MONTRÉALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$13k · revenue +71%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Québec

Récompenser et encourager l'excellence la créativité et la détermination des artistes de la génération montante. dons à l'orchestre symphonique de québec

—
2
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
3
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
4
Fondation I Musici De Montreal

Son objectif est de contribuer aux charges de fonctionnement de l'orchestre i musici de montréal.

—
5
Fondation Du Musee D'art Contemporain De Montreal

Versement de dons au musée d'art contemporain de montréal

—
6
Fondation de l'Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal

Recueillir des dons des legs ou d'autres contributions administrer ses éléments d'actif et organiser des campagnes de souscription afin d'encourager des projets éducatifs de formation et de sensibilisation du public à la musique dans le…

—
7
Fondation le Piolet
—
8
Fondation Jean-Michel Dufour
—
9
Fondation Jordi Bonet
—
10
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—
11
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
12
Fondation Laurent Duvernay-Tardif
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Desjardins and the most unlike its peers is Relief - Le chemin de la santé mentale Relief - the path of mental health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION DU MUSÉE MCCORD — C$35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION LE CHAÎNON — C$31,140 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFONDATION DESJARDINS — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFESTIVAL CLASSICA — C$18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetORCHESTRE MÉTROPOLITAIN DE MONTRÉAL — C$17,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSÉE DES BEAUX-ARTS DE MONTRÉAL — C$12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION LCI ÉDUCATION — C$10,755 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFondation Maman Dion — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCENTRE FRANÇOIS MICHELLE — C$7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION REVIVRE — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION DE LA PLACE DES ARTS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Royal Victoria Hospital Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUCAN — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLES VIOLONS DU ROY — C$3,575 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU COLLÈGE MARIE-VICTORIN — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFONDATION POUR L'ALPHABÉTISATION — C$1,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation DesjardinsFondation Famille God…Fondation Philantra P…Jewish Community Foun…La Fondation du Grand…Fondation LCI Éducati…Fondation Sibylla Hes…The Azrieli Foundatio…Wcpd FoundationFondation Sandra et A…Fondation Famille Lég…La Fondation Rossy th…
Fondation DesjardinsQC11.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Desjardins · Fondation Famille Godin - Godin Family Foundation · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Fondation LCI Éducation / LCI Education Foundation · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Wcpd Foundation · Fondation Sandra et Alain Bouchard · Fondation Famille Léger · La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119007292:2020-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Collège Lasalle / Lasalle College’s filings →