Jonquiere, QC · Charitable organization
College D'Enseignement General Et Professionnel de Jonquiere
Offrir des programmes pré-universitaires et techniques aux élèves pour les préparer à l'université ou à accéder au marchédu travail.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORAMH | C$5,000 |
| LA SOUPIÈRE DE JONQUIÈRE | C$1,860 |
| FONDATION SANTÉ JONQUIÈRE | C$220 |
| COEUR + AVC | C$100 |
| SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER | C$20 |
| FONDATION DE L'INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE CARDIOLOGIE ET DE P | C$20 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$340 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- GLGO LE GRAND DÉFI INC2× · 2018–2019 · C$7k · revenue -24%
- CCORAMH3× · 2018–2023 · C$6k · revenue +35%
- LSLA SOUPIÈRE DE JONQUIÈRE2× · 2018–2023 · C$2k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- LSLA SOCIÉT- SAINT-VINCENT-DE-PAUL-CONSEIL PARTICULIER DE JONQgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$350 · revenue ×11
- TTEL-AIDEone grant, 2019 · C$325 · revenue +7%
- LFLA FONDATION PATRO DE JONQUIÉREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$192 · revenue +310%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Contribuer au développement des activités médicales de même qu'à la promotion de la recherche sous toutes ses formes dans la région du saguenay
Verser des dons à des donataires reconnus
Dons à des donataires reconnus.
Ammasser des fonds dans le but de soutenir et d'aider les personnes atteintes de maladies rénales dans la région du saguenay-lac-st-jean
Contribuer à l'accessibilité et à la proximité des soins de santé dispensés aux personnes et aux familles du saguenay-lac-st-jean et de préserver une plus grande autonomie régionale. l'organisme travaille en partenariat avec le ciusss du…
Utiliser les dons reçus et les revenus générés à des fins de bienfaisance par le versement de fonds à des donataires reconnus.
50% des soins au près des personnes démunis et 50% soins aux personnes agées
Dons à des donataires reconnus
Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Famille Jules Dallaire and the most unlike its peers is Maison Revivre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GO LE GRAND DÉFI INC ↗
- Who funds CORAMH ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPIÈRE DE JONQUIÈRE ↗
- Who funds LA SOCIÉT- SAINT-VINCENT-DE-PAUL-CONSEIL PARTICULIER DE JONQ ↗
- Who funds TEL-AIDE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION SANTÉ JONQUIÈRE ↗
- Who funds LA FONDATION PATRO DE JONQUIÉRE ↗
- Who funds CONCOURS DE MUSIQUE DU CANADA ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER ↗
- Who funds COEUR + AVC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION FAMILLE JULES DALLAIRE ↗
- Who funds LA MARÉE REGROUPMENT DES PARENTS & AMIS DE LA PERSONNE ATTEI ↗
- Who funds MAISON REVIVRE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE CARDIOLOGIE ET DE P ↗
- Who funds MAISON DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DU SAGUENAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Centraide Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean Inc. · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.