Montreal, QC · Public foundation
Club Rotary de Montreal Fonds de Bienfaisance / Rotary Club of Montreal Welfare Fund
Charitable contributions in support of community and international welfare.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$6k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEPAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | C$11,000 |
| THE ROTARY FOUNDATION (CANADA) | C$3,598 |
| L'ESCADRON 96 ALOUETTES | C$2,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION (CANADA)8× · 2017–2024 · C$498k · revenue +7%
- OBOLD BREWERY MISSION4× · 2017–2020 · C$8k · revenue +82%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMY4× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue +746%
Funded once
- FHFONDATION HAITI PARTAGEone grant, 2018 · C$24k
- VFVELAN FOUNDATION AWARDone grant, 2017 · C$20k
- RCROTARY CLUB OF OTTAWA CHARITY FUNDone grant, 2020 · C$12k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Recevoir des dons et d'autres contributions et les utiliser afin d'améliorer la qualité des soins et des services. contribuer à l'enseignement et à la diffusion d'information sur la santé. acquérir l'équipement nécessaire et prioritaire au…
Aide aux devoirs après l'école lecture nourriture sports aprés nourriture
Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse
Contribue à l'adoption de saines habitudes de vie chez les jeunes par l'activité physique et la saine alimentation ainsi qu'à la recherche sur les maladies héréditaires orphelines.
La promotion de la saine santé mentale -la promotion de la langue française -la persévérance scolaire -la santé physique -soutien des projets environnementaux qui améliorent la qualité de vie de l'enfance la jeunesse francophone et de ses…
Supporter des organismes dans but lucratif qui soutiennent des projets et des initiatives pour les jeunes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du refuge pour femmes Chez Doris Inc. Chez Doris Women's Shelter Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Nepal Community Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION (CANADA) ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF GANANOQUE ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF CORNWALL SUNRISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fondation rue des Femmes ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF OTTAWA CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds LES AILES DE L'ESPÉRANCE ↗
- Who funds NEPAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OLD BREWERY MISSION ↗
- Who funds NOVA MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds Weredale Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds LA LIGUE DES CADETS DE L'AIR DU CANADA-ESCARDRON 96 ALOUETTE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CLUB ROTARY DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds THE VANIER COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLUB ZAHLE MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds Elizabeth House ↗
- Who funds THE PARK EXTENSION YOUTH ORGANIZATION (PEYO) ↗
- Who funds SOCIÉTÉ D'ÉDUCATION POUR LE CYCLISME À MONTRÉAL (CYCLO NORD- ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION DES PODIATRES SANS FRONTIERES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation de la famille Zeller · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · The George Hogg Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · The Holt Foundation · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Hylcan Foundation / La Fondation Hylcan · Fondation Jeanne-Esther · Fondation Coup de Coeur · The Peacock family foundation · La Fondation Rossy the Rossy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.