Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Canfield, ON · Public foundation

Climb Hamilton

We organize an annual stair climb that raises awareness of healthy lifestyles and funds that contribute to the total health of the community and support other charities with contributions.

C$20k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANKS CANADAC$8,000
FOOD4KIDS HAMILTONC$4,000
THE JURAVINSKI FOUNDATIONC$4,000
GLOBAL CITIZENS CARE FOR UNDERPRIVILEGED AND REFUGEE EMPOWERC$1,000
CANCER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CITY OF HAMILTON & DISTRICTC$1,000
HAMILTON FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT SUCCESSC$1,000
YWCA HAMILTONC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 3 repeat orgsC$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

C$14k
C$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%
+71%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HAMILTON FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$11k · revenue +176%
  • CA
    CANCER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CITY OF HAMILTON & DISTRICT
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$2k · revenue +111%
  • YH
    YWCA HAMILTON
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$1k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANKS CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$8k · revenue +71%
  • FH
    FOOD4KIDS HAMILTON
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k · revenue -29%
  • TJ
    THE JURAVINSKI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k · revenue +63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAMILTON FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS — C$11,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD BANKS CANADA — C$8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD4KIDS HAMILTON — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JURAVINSKI FOUNDATION — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CITY OF HAMILTON & DISTRICT — C$1,560 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA HAMILTON — C$1,275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CITIZENS CARE FOR UNDERPRIVILEGED AND REFUGEE EMPOWER — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Golden Hor…Hamilton Community Fo…Canada GivesMohawk College of App…Bulldogs Foundation I…Hamilton-Wentworth Re…The Chml Children's F…Charities Aid Foundat…Aqueduct FoundationCharitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…My Tribute Gift Found…
United Way Golden HorseshoeON9.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Hamilton Community Foundation · Canada Gives · Mohawk College of Applied Arts & Technology · Bulldogs Foundation Inc. · Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Employees Charity Trustpr · The Chml Children's Fund · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Aqueduct Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · My Tribute Gift Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2021) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 729238881:2020-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Climb Hamilton’s filings →