Burnaby, BC · Charitable organization
Cliff Avenue United Church
Providing: worship; bible study; pastoral care; distribution food via 'bread ministry'; fellowship groups - all via zoom/e-mails/phone calls & free time; according to covid 19 protocals - final worship - open air per covid 19 protocals
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PACIFIC MOUNTAIN REGION COUNCIL UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA | C$15,000 |
| THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA | C$13,091 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$15k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA3× · 2017–2019 · C$35k
- TUTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA2× · 2020–2021 · C$19k · revenue -5%
- WPWestminster Presbytery2× · 2017–2018 · C$16k
Funded once
- BHBBY HOMELESS SHELTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +164%
- FUFIRST UNITED CHURCHone grant, 2020 · C$255
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.