Clearwater, BC · Charitable organization
Clearwater New Life Assembly
House of prayer place of worship kids youth and family ministries
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k5 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$19k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA AND YU | C$18,554 |
| METRO KIDS SOCIETY | C$5,000 |
| VAVENBY CHRISTIAN CHURCH | C$3,166 |
| ETHNOS CANADA | C$2,390 |
| CLEARWATER FOOD BANK | C$1,200 |
| PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -84% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- VCVAVENBY CHRISTIAN CHURCH7× · 2018–2024 · C$19k · revenue +21%
- ECETHNOS CANADA7× · 2018–2024 · C$10k · revenue +9%
- CFCLEARWATER FOOD BANK SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +561%
Funded once
- CCCLEARWATER COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue -84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church services bible study local mission work visitations benevolance help
Weekly churh ministries support of missionaries
Conduct weekly worship services. provide weekly ministries for women men children and youth. provide pastoral care and counselling. contributes funds for international missionary efforts.
Weekly worship service ministries for men women and children oversee missionary activities
The vision of clearview christian reformed church is equipping everyone to take the next step in following jesus christ. we are devoted to international discipleship god-centered worship in all of life and actively blessing those around us…
We provide worship services. We carry out missionary work. We support missionaries by providing financial assistance.
Propagation of the christian faith
Provide financial support of missionaries and mission organizations
Missions and church to teach the word of god
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clearwater Christian Church and the most unlike its peers is Maranatha Missionary Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.