Hamilton, ON · Charitable organization
Classis Hamilton of the Christian Reformed Church
Classis Hamilton deals with church governance matters including but not limited to promotion and governance of university and college campus ministries youth ministries church plant and student funds to assist seminary students.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SoCo Beach Project | C$10,000 |
| Act Five Initiatives | C$10,000 |
| New Hope Church | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SMShalom Manor3× · 2018–2020 · C$65k · revenue +84%
- NHNew Hope Church3× · 2018–2024 · C$16k · revenue +77%
- MFMeadowlands Fellowship CRC5× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- CNClassis Niagara of the Christian Reformed Churchone grant, 2017 · C$43k · revenue -1%
- CCCrosstown Churchone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue -10%
- CTClassis Torontoone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church services for worship and prayer religious education and instruction programs missions. programs and alleviation of poverty. outreach to the community through evangelism.
Christianity from a traditional reformed perspective is furthered through church worship services sunday school mission and relief work in third world countries.
We provide weekly worship services; organize and provide religious instruction; provide pastoral care; facilitate church work; equip church members; fund and organize activities beneficial to the community; provide benevolent assistance to…
Minister to and meet the needs of the members of the congregation and the surrounding community. weekly worship services are held to provide pastoral care. we donate funds to the denomination headquarters and overseas missionary programs.
Church services varous weekly bible study groups and outreach programs
Hold weekly worship services give pastoral care support local outreach programs support missionaries at home and abroad catechism sunday school classes and evangelism
Public services for worship and prayer religious education and instruction programs missions programs and alleviation of poverty.
Promoting our religion through instruction and spiritual support of fellowship. provide denominational support provide outreach programs.
To proclaim the gospel of the lord jesus christ through the church.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meadowlands Fellowship Christian Reformed Church and the most unlike its peers is Act Five Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Shalom Manor ↗
- Who funds Classis Niagara of the Christian Reformed Church ↗
- Who funds New Hope Church ↗
- Who funds Act Five Initiatives ↗
- Who funds SoCo Beach Project ↗
- Who funds Crosstown Church ↗
- Who funds Classis Toronto ↗
- Who funds Meadowlands Fellowship CRC ↗
- Who funds IMMANUEL CRC ↗
- Who funds HAGERSVILLE CRC ↗
- Who funds Mount Hope Community CRC ↗
- Who funds Bethal CRC ↗
- Who funds Ebenezer CRC ↗
- Who funds Immanuel CRC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Christian Reformed Church in North America-Canada Corporation · Christian Stewardship Services · Meadowlands Fellowship Christian Reformed Church · Hagersville Community Christian Reformed Church · Link Charity Canada Inc · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.