Skip to content
Canadian charities

Etobicoke, ON · Public foundation

Ciffa Cares

To receive and maintain funds and to apply all or part of the principle and income therefrom to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act (canada).

C$85k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$74k
C$6,794
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTENNIAL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGYC$40,160
THE SIR FLEMING COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGYC$33,800
THE LAMPTON COLLEGE FOUNDATIONC$6,794
LANGARA COLLEGE FOUNDATIONC$2,780
SENECA COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGYC$1,200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$134k · 5 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

C$134k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTENNIAL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$69k · revenue +19%
  • TS
    THE SIR FLEMING COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$43k · revenue +69%
  • TL
    THE LAMBTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$15k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • GB
    GEORGE BROWN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +21%
  • BC
    BULLYING CANADA
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTENNIAL COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY — C$69,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SIR FLEMING COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY — C$42,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$15,294 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLANGARA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$4,780 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENECA COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE BROWN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBULLYING CANADA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Smart Serve OntarioThe Masonic Foundatio…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…World Wildlife Fund C…Toronto FoundationCharitable Gift Funds…Charities Aid Foundat…United Way of Greater…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Smart Serve OntarioON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Smart Serve Ontario · The Masonic Foundation of Ontario · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · World Wildlife Fund Canada Fonds Mondial Pour la Nature Can Ada · Toronto Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 758748909:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ciffa Cares’ filings →