Thunder Bay, ON · Charitable organization
Church of the Holy Trinty St Jude the Anglican Catholic Chur
Church services and charitable support
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADA UKRAINE FOUNDATION | C$500 |
| THE TRADITIONAL ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA | C$500 |
| GEORGE JEFFREY CENTRE | C$250 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TRADITIONAL ANGLICAN CHURCH OF CANADA6× · 2017–2022 · C$6k · revenue +33% · 28% of their budget
- GJGEORGE JEFFREY CENTRE4× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue +62%
- SASALVATION ARMY4× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue ×11
Funded once
- GWGFA WORLDone grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue -22%
- TATRADITIONAL ANGLICAN PARISH OF ST BRIDEone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue -16%
- SAST ANDREW DEW DROP INNgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +225%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food distribution service to those who can't adequately provide for their own nutritional needs
Construction of simple affordable housing and provision of interest-free mortgages and conditional forgiveness of second mortgages for qualified families in need of assistance
To receive and maintain a fund/funds and apply the funds or income therefrom for religious charitable or educational purposes within the province of ontario. to promote and enhance the well-being of children and families in the district of…
The purpose of this charity is to provide hampers of food clothing and toys to needy families with young children at christmas each year. fund raising activies are conducted by christmas cheer volunteers and the thunder bay firefighter's…
Support for organizations providing services to the homeless and hard to house
The charity continued to rent its facilities on loon lake to other charities providing camping opportunities for their children. renewal of its facilities over as much as a decade neared completion.
To fund facilitate and carry out projects to relieve human suffering (in cases of conflict calamity disaster and poverty) hunger and need and provide developmental aid and assistance both in Canada and worldwide as an extension of the…
To relieve poverty by providing food and other basic supplies to persons of low income by establishing operating and maintaining a food bank.
To promote support and protect the status and interest of people with a developmental disability and the general well-being and welfare of such persons; To solicit receive and hold contributions of money and property; To raise and hold…
The primary purpose of the charity is to provide housing for senior citizens. other activities include the operation of a restaurant used by the residents and general public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Andrew Soup Kitchen Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Thunder Bay Emergency Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.