Moncton, NB · Charitable organization
Christians Gathered in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ Known as Christian Brethren
Church Services Bible Study Preaching the Gospel Sunday School and work with children and youth of the community both in person and using Zoom and virtual meetings.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Missionary Service Committee | C$2,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MSMISSIONARY SERVICE COMMITTEE7× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +57%
- HHHarvest House Atlantic Inc3× · 2021–2023 · C$3k · revenue +98%
- FIFBH INTERNATIONAL2× · 2018–2022 · C$1k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- CBCharlottetown Bible Chapelone grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue +6%
- HGHalifax Gospel Hall Associationone grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue +24%
- FDFOOD DEPOT ALIMENTAIRE INCone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Purchase and placement of bibles and scripture portions throughout canada and in other countries. sharing the gospel through personal evangelism and church partnership.
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Radio program book/resource distribution conference ministry
Distribution and writing of sunday school material and school curricula.
Teaching training and book publishing.
Production of radio programs for children producing printed materials to listeners who respond to mail. bible courses for children purchase radio air time.
The organization distributes Christian literature and erects Gospel message signs throughout Canada.
Creating and broadcasring television programming to advance the christian religion in canada by various means
To advance religion by preacing the teachings and religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with christian faith.
Provide christian literature and bible lessons to interested people
Assisting the local church in canada and asia by providing literature information and training.
Christian radio broadcasts
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Msc Canada and the most unlike its peers is Family Bible Hour. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSIONARY SERVICE COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Charlottetown Bible Chapel ↗
- Who funds Harvest House Atlantic Inc ↗
- Who funds Halifax Gospel Hall Association ↗
- Who funds FBH INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FOOD DEPOT ALIMENTAIRE INC ↗
- Who funds UPLOOK MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN COUNCIL of CHRISTIAN CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.