Abbotsford, BC · Charitable organization
Christian Outreach of Canada
Educate train and ordain christian leaders; educate members and their families in christianity; operate a private christian school for k-9 & jrk; provide and care for people in the community; christian missionary work in foreign countries; providing christian training and care
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIFE SPRING CHURCH ABBOTSFORD | C$206,950 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$207k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCCYRUS CENTRE MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2023 · C$109k · revenue +251%
- AFABBOTSFORD FOOD BANK4× · 2019–2022 · C$56k · revenue +49%
- TGTHE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA7× · 2017–2023 · C$8k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- PIPARTNERS INTERNATIONALone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +10%
- SCSOUTHGATE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -29%
- CLCITY LIFE CHURCHone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
Weekly sunday church service home fellowship meetings weekly bible study seminars
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Capstone ministries is a christian church formed for the fellowship of believers for the propagation of the christian church and faith and the furtherance of the christian mission.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Heights Church and the most unlike its peers is The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada/Conseil De Direction De L'armÉE Du Salut Du Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFE SPRING CHURCH ABBOTSFORD ↗
- Who funds CYRUS CENTRE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SET FREE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ABBOTSFORD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds LATITUDE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SOUTHGATE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds CITY DREAM CENTRE ↗
- Who funds CITY LIFE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL HEIGHTS CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.