Fort St. John, BC · Charitable organization
Christian Life Centre of Fort St. John
Operation of church and school in fort st.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLUMBIA PARA CRISTO SOCIETY | C$2,400 |
| NORTH PEACE PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE SOCIETY | C$1,200 |
| MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE | C$300 |
| THE MARANATHA EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CPColombia Para Cristo Society5× · 2017–2021 · C$12k · revenue +62%
- YWYouth With A Mission Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · C$7k · revenue +5%
- TBTeach Beyond2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- YWYouth With A Mission (BC) Societyone grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +20%
- FSFORT ST JOHN WOMEN'S RESOURCE SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue -7%
- NHNational House of Prayerone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue -40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Sunday worship services sunday school youth group junior youth group weekly bible studies ladies outreach vacation bible school
Missionary organizations evangelism religious publishing and broadcasting literacy/education/training programs.
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
The organization's purpose is to preach teach advance disseminate and demonstrate the gospel of jesus christ and the related truths of the holy bible to people everywhere.
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Church Services Retreats and Youth Fellowships
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Provides counselling services retreats workshops consultation podcasting personal mentoring and christian faith formation.
We hold worship and prayer services. we have ministries for families men women young adults youth and children. we hold bible studies. we hold retreats for youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth With a Mission (Bc) Society and the most unlike its peers is Resurrection Recovery Resource Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Colombia Para Cristo Society ↗
- Who funds North Peace Pregnancy Care Centre ↗
- Who funds Youth With A Mission Foundation ↗
- Who funds Youth With A Mission (BC) Society ↗
- Who funds FORT ST JOHN WOMEN'S RESOURCE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Teach Beyond ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF REVIVAL MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds National House of Prayer ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds Resurrection Recovery Resource Society DBA Freedom's Doo ↗
- Who funds Peace Lutheran Church ↗
- Who funds THE MARANATHA EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds FORT ST JOHN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Charlie Lake Community Church ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · Vancouver Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.