Skip to content

Dunnville, ON · Charitable organization

Christian Church Sweets Corners

We hold weekly worship services*we hold weekly bible study classes*we provide pastoral care* *we operate a cemetery*we give support to missions and other charities

C$133k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$91k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k11 grants · C$42k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$91k
C$4,342
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bodega SA Grasya MissionC$91,082
Haldimand Pregnancy CenterC$4,447
Teen CHallengeC$4,342
Sew on Fires MinistryC$4,342
Jarvis Caring CupboardC$4,342
Ontario Christian GleanersC$4,342
Crossroads Christian CommunicationsC$4,342
Teen ChallengeC$3,091
Sew on Fires MinistryC$3,091
Jarvis Caring C upboardC$3,091
GleanersC$3,091
Crossroads Christian CommunicationsC$3,091
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 52% of grant dollars (C$144k). The 48% that went abroad (C$133k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 48% of all-years giving (C$133k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$144k · 7 repeat orgsC$133k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

C$144k
C$133k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$33k · revenue +40%
  • HP
    HALDIMAND PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$21k · revenue +15%
  • SO
    SEW ON FIRE MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$21k · revenue +343%

Funded once

  • BS
    Bodega SA Grasya Mission
    one grant, 2024 · C$91k
  • CC
    Crossroads Christian Communications
    one grant, 2024 · C$7k
  • SO
    Sew on Fires Ministry
    one grant, 2024 · C$7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEEN CHALLENGE — C$32,613 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJARVIS CARING CUPBOARD FOOD BANK — C$21,747 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetHALDIMAND PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE — C$21,385 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSEW ON FIRE MINISTRIES — C$21,358 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetCROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED — C$20,998 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetONTARIO CHRISTIAN GLEANERS — C$18,457 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHAPELTIME MINISTRIES OF CANADA INCORPORATED — C$7,064 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds JARVIS CARING CUPBOARD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HALDIMAND PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SEW ON FIRE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ONTARIO CHRISTIAN GLEANERS ↗
  • Who funds CHAPELTIME MINISTRIES OF CANADA INCORPORATED ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118856079:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Christian Church Sweets Corners’ filings →