Kanata, ON · Charitable organization
Christ Risen Lutheran Church
Providing spiritual care religious education to members and others in the community.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lutheran Church Canada | C$4,000 |
| Malabar Mission society | C$2,566 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 80% of grant dollars (C$80k). The 20% that went abroad (C$20k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 20% of all-years giving (C$20k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LCLutheran Church Canada6× · 2019–2024 · C$51k
- LCLutheran Church Canada, East District2× · 2017–2018 · C$20k · revenue -78%
- LWLutheran Womens Missionary League3× · 2019–2021 · C$9k
Funded once
- CLChrist Lutheran Churchone grant, 2023 · C$1k
- CLCanadian Lutheran World Reliefgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$710 · revenue +56%
- LLAMPone grant, 2020 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lutheran Church Canada, East District ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN WOMEN'S MISSIONARY LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Malabar Mission Society ↗
- Who funds Ottawa Lutheran Refugee Sponsorship Committee ↗
- Who funds Canadian Lutheran World Relief ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.