Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Calgary, AB · Charitable organization

Christ Moravian Community Church

Provide for spiritual emotional and educational needs of constituents through worship study counselling and group discussions in the City of Calgary Alberta by means of a weekly in-church service of Zoom meetings and of a weekly livestream service.

C$50k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$39k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$625
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$49k
C$10,310
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$223k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Board of Elders of the Canadian District of the MoravianC$38,685
McDougall United ChurchC$10,310
Van Es Camp & Conference CentreC$500
The Mustard SeedC$125
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$254k · 6 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$254k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-8%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    McDougall United Church
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$23k · revenue +7%
  • MU
    McDOUGALL UNITED CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$4k · revenue +22%
  • CI
    CALGARY INTERFAITH FOOD BANK
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$4k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CU
    Canada Ukraine Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -80%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S COTTAGE SOCIETY OF CALGARYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$175 · revenue +55%
  • CH
    Calgary Homeless Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · C$50 · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Calgary Affordable Housing Foundation

Charitable status was received on April 1 2018 and CAHF has been in a set up phase since that time. In this current fiscal year there has been activity related to preparing to deliver charitable activities which can be described as…

—
2
The Boma Calgary Foundation
—
3
Calgary Co-Op Community Foundation

Relief of poverty through food security and other supports for vulnerable populations including at-risk youth seniors and others in the community; Advancement of education through scholarships bursaries and grants Providing benefit to the…

—
4
Edmonton Realtors' Charitable Foundation

The foundation provides support to those in need by working with charities involved in: shelter homelessness hunger crime prevention and special projects.

—
5
Chilliwack Housing for Homeless Foundation

Alleviate homelessness by increasing housing supply. Work with other non profits for the best use of such housing.

—
6
Red Deer Open Doors Housing Foundation
—
7
Bild Calgary Region Foundation

BILD Calgary Region Foundation was incorporated in 1986 with a mandate; to aid the community in which members of BILD Calgary Region work and live by supporting shelter related charitable initiatives education opportunities and shelter…

—
8
Hospice Calgary Foundation
—
9
The Mustard Seed Society

The mustard seed is a christian charitable organization that is servicing vulnerable citizens in alberta and british columbia. in calgary the charity offers an expansive range of innovative programs and services including education and…

—
10
The Charis Village Housing Foundation of Central Alberta
—
11
Calgary Drop-in & Rehab Centre Society

The Calgary Drop-In & Rehab Centre provides access to a spectrum of care that supports adults at risk of homelessness to the most independent living possible - including various emergency shelter programs and services and affordable and…

—
12
The Calgary Foundation

The Calgary Foundation carried out its charitable purpose through the ongoing administration of its granting programs. While the Foundation provides grants to support charitable activity across the entire sector it has a particular focus…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcdougall United Church and the most unlike its peers is Mcdougall United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Board of Elders of the Canadian District of the Moravian — C$219,274 over 7y, 22% of budgetMcDougall United Church — C$22,980 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetCanada Ukraine Foundation — C$4,515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcDOUGALL UNITED CHURCH — C$4,150 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCALGARY INTERFAITH FOOD BANK — C$3,657 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mustard Seed — C$3,495 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColdest Night of the Year — C$180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S COTTAGE SOCIETY OF CALGARY — C$175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalgary Homeless Foundation — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118858562:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Christ Moravian Community Church’s filings →