Skip to content

Neepawa, MB · Charitable organization

Christ Lutheran Church

Weekly worship services & bible study.

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$410
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$382k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADAC$1,940
LUTHERAN WOMEN'S MISSIONARY LEAGUE CANADA INCC$1,390
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYC$410
CANADIAN LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEFC$390
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN SEMINARYC$285
LUTHERAN LAYMANS LEAUGEC$25
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$131k · 9 repeat orgsC$520 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

C$131k
C$520

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    Concordia Lutheran Seminary
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +48%
  • CL
    CANADIAN LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +56%
  • LW
    Lutheran Women Missionary League
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • PM
    PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN. HEALTH CARE-COUNTRY MEADOWS
    one grant, 2021 · C$170
  • NH
    NEEPAWA HEALTH CENTRE
    one grant, 2019 · C$155
  • RM
    RC MISSION BOAT SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · C$110

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA — C$112,220 over 8y, 97% of budgetConcordia Lutheran Seminary — C$3,630 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF — C$2,128 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLutheran Women Missionary League — C$2,088 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — C$1,770 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN LAYMAN LEAGUE — C$453 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNeepawa Health Centre — C$85 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA ↗
  • Who funds Concordia Lutheran Seminary ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Lutheran Women Missionary League ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN LAYMAN LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Neepawa Health Centre ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lutheran Church - Canada Financial MinistriesMB9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lutheran Church - Canada Financial Ministries · Trinity Lutheran Church of Moosomin · St.Paul Lutheran Church of Village of Springside Inc. · Prince of Peace Lutheran Church Regina Inc. · Messiah Evangelical Lutheran Church · Faith Lutheran Church · Foothills Lutheran Church of Calgary · Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118858265:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Christ Lutheran Church’s filings →