Woodstock, ON · Charitable organization
Christ Church
Weekly public services for worship prayer religious education & training.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$6k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$16k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INCORPORATED SYNOD DIOCESE OF HURON | C$15,726 |
| PRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND | C$5,175 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE LONDON | C$200 |
| WOODSTOCK GENERAL HOSPITAL | C$200 |
| SLEEPING CHILDREN AROUND THE WORLD | C$200 |
| HURON CHURCH CAMP | C$200 |
| OPERATION SHARING THE INN | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OSOperation Sharing8× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +381%
- SPSt Paul's Cathedral7× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +36%
- WGWOODSTOCK GENERAL HOSPITAL7× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +184%
Funded once
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE LONDONone grant, 2024 · C$200 · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide funding to women's college hospital.
Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital
Raises holds and invests funds for capital projects of the lake of the woods district hospital
The organization received donations and made donations to other charities to support its purposes
Provide grants and gifts of equipment to the oakville site of halton healthcare services corporation
To maintain a fund to enhance or improve patient services for st. marys memorial hospital. the foundation works with the community to raise funds for major renovations special projects equipment and education for st. marys memorial…
Donating to local hospital
Provide source of funding to wingham and district hospital for capital purchases. primary objective is to act as the fundraising arm for the hospital to receive and maintain funds from all fundraising revenues and to make donations to the…
The charity provides support to VON Perth Huron whose purpose is dedicated to ensuring the availability of quality health care in the home and community.
The charity was established to exclusively to benefit charitable organizations and causes throughout the world
Provide short-term accommodation to families during treatment of their critically ill children being treated at nearby hospitals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Southwestern Ontario and the most unlike its peers is Saint Monica House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INCORPORATED SYNOD DIOCESE OF HURON ↗
- Who funds PRIMATES WORLD RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds Anglican Church Women Diocese of Huron ↗
- Who funds Operation Sharing ↗
- Who funds St Paul's Cathedral ↗
- Who funds SLEEPING CHILDREN AROUND THE WORLD ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds VON OXFORD SAKURA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE LONDON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.