Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Williams Lake, BC · Charitable organization

Choice for Life Society of Williams Lake

Monthly meetings and annual meeting on June 3rd 2024.

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPEWELL CLINIC & PREGNANCY CENTREC$1,874
SIGNAL HILL LIFE EDUCATION SOCIETYC$1,000
EUTHANASIA PREVENTION COALITIONC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$16k · 3 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

C$16k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+55%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SIGNAL HILL
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue -53%
  • LC
    LIFE CANADA ASSOCIATION INC.
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$5k
  • HC
    HOPEWELL CLINIC & PREGNANCY CENTRE
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$4k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • RV
    RACHEL'S VINEYARD
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k
  • KP
    KAMLOOPS PRO-LIFE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k
  • VM
    V-K0L MEDIA MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSIGNAL HILL — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEWELL CLINIC & PREGNANCY CENTRE — C$4,409 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL — C$500 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIGNAL HILL ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL CLINIC & PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 889926978:2024-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Choice for Life Society of Williams Lake’s filings →