Skip to content

Swift Current, SK · Charitable organization

Chinook School Division No. 211

Providing educational programs to students K-12 in southwestern Saskatchewan.

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$520
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kinsmen Foundation Inc.C$2,796
LSC Food Bank CorporationC$545
Village of Val MarieC$525
The Royal Canadian LegionC$520
The Royal Canadian LegionC$200
The Salvation ArmyC$150
Provincial Association of Transition Houses & Services SKC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$9k · 4 repeat orgsC$26k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

C$9k
C$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    Kinsmen Foundation Inc.
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$4k · revenue -20%
  • DN
    Dr. Noble Irwin Regional Healthcare Foundation Inc.
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$3k · revenue +7%
  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$2k · revenue -11537%

Funded once

  • TO
    Town of Maple Creek
    one grant, 2021 · C$14k
  • FS
    First Steps Wellness Centre Inc.
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k · revenue +25%
  • CK
    Creative Kids Canada Inc.
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Nurses Foundation

Providing bursaries to individuals wanting to further their studies in nursing.

—
2
South Country Health Care Foundation Inc

South country health care foundation raises money through donations and fund raising and subsequently grants funds to various capital projects in the south country area of saskatchewan on basis of needs.

—
3
Royal Canadian Legion Saskatoon Branch No 001

Veterans assistance & families student bursaries support cadets veterans comfort - carehomes & hospitals veterans assistance promote remembrance

—
4
Royal Canadian Legion Kamsack Sask. #24 Branch Poppy Fund

Looking after veterans + their spouces

—
5
Saskatchewan Indigenous Community Foundation
—
6
Saskatchewan Professional Fire Fighters Burn Fund
—
7
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
8
Royal Canadian Legion Moosomin Sask. Branch 81 Poppy Fund

Support for the needy veterans and dependents provide comfort for hospitals veterans and family dependents.

—
9
Als Society of Saskatchewan Inc.

Programs and services supporting those affected by als including equipment loan programs adapted technology and support groups

—
10
North Saskatchewan Valley Foundation

Low income rental property for the elderly

—
11
Saskatoon Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc.

The organization is dedicated to helping build a compassionate community where every animal is respected and protected by providing sheltering adoption services and lifesaving care to meet the immediate needs of at risk animals while…

—
12
Royal Canadian Legion Saskatoon (Sask No 63) Branch Poppy Fund

Poppy day campaign occurs once a year. for donations of money poppies and wreaths are distributed on remembrance day. theses funds are transferred to the canadian legion poppy day fund which provides assistance to veterans and their…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saskatchewan Abilities Council Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Swift Current Branch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFirst Steps Wellness Centre Inc. — C$4,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKinsmen Foundation Inc. — C$3,818 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDr. Noble Irwin Regional Healthcare Foundation Inc. — C$2,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCreative Kids Canada Inc. — C$2,157 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Salvation Army — C$1,717 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndian Residential School Survivors Society — C$1,518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaskatchewan Abilities Council — C$1,415 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Royal Canadian Legion — C$670 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLSC Food Bank Corporation — C$545 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetThe Royal Canadian Legion — C$200 over 1y, 13% of budgetProvincial Association of Transition Houses & Services SK — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarmichael Outreach — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA Swift Current — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp.SK10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · United Way of Regina · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Board of Education of the Regina Roman Catholic Separate School Division No.81 of Saskatchewan · Access Communications Children's Fund Inc. · Saskatoon Community Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 831174073:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chinook School Division No. 211’s filings →