North York, ON · Charitable organization
Ching Far Temple
Weekly buddhist services
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAHAYANA PURELAND TEMPLE | C$28,000 |
| LOTUS BLOOMING BUDDHIST CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| MUI KWOK BUDDHIST TEMPLE | C$5,000 |
| BUDDHIST EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CANADA | C$3,000 |
| CHAN BUDDHIST SOCIETY OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| BUDDHIST DHARMALAKSANA SOCIETY (ONTARIO) | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MPMAHAYANA PURELAND TEMPLE7× · 2018–2024 · C$96k · revenue +57%
- LBLOTUS BLOOMING BUDDHIST CHARITABLE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · C$60k · revenue +21%
- BDBuddhist Dharmalaksana Society (Ontario4× · 2017–2024 · C$13k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CSCHAM SHAN TEMPLEone grant, 2023 · C$2k
- BPBUDDHIST PRAJNA TEMPLEone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue -74%
- TBTAI BAY BUDDHIST TEMPLEone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Teaching buddhism
Place of worship amitbha chanting and meditation sessions lectures discussions and seminars on buddhism.
Group meditation recitation of monk's rules ordination of monks dhamma talks
Preach promote and advance the spiritual teaching of buddhism
Religious practice such as recite heart sutra great compassion mantra the sutra of the dharma great prajna sutra buddhist lectures sing buddhist songs and music and meditation workshop.
Religious meetings services and classes teaching the Buddhist faith.
Weekly buddhist services
Place of worship & prayer
Worship and meditation classes delivering lectures in buddhism periodically inviting buddhist monks and nuns to perform buddhist ceremonies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Buddhist Prajna Temple and the most unlike its peers is The Mahayana Pure Land Temple. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAHAYANA PURELAND TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds LOTUS BLOOMING BUDDHIST CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Buddhist Dharmalaksana Society (Ontario ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHAM SHAN TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds MUI KWOK BUDDHIST TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds CHAN BUDDHIST SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST PRAJNA TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds TAI BAY BUDDHIST TEMPLE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chan Buddhist Society of Canada · Buddhist Dharmalaksana Society of Ontario · Buddhist Prajna Temple · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.