Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Chevra Oseh Chesed Financial Assistance Organization

The charity distributes money to needy individuals or families to meet their basic daily needs such as rent clothes & food.

C$211k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$29k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$70k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$113k
C$5,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$60,100
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$52,430
BIKUR CHOLIMC$18,750
YESHIVAS OHOLEI MENAHEM MENDELC$15,000
BNOS BAIS YAAKOVC$14,000
CHEDER CHABADC$12,000
BNOS CHAYAC$10,000
CARING KINDNESSC$6,000
TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLELC$5,000
CONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOVC$5,000
MESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM LUBAVITCHC$4,000
THE INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATIONC$2,500
VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$1,700
AGUDATH ISRAELC$1,680
TOMCHEI SHABBOSC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$792k · 21 repeat orgsC$74k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

C$792k
C$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+4%

Still filing today

95%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$238k · revenue +3%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$133k · revenue +423%
  • YY
    YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$130k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • BO
    BETH OLOTH
    one grant, 2017 · C$13k
  • EM
    EZRAT MEHABRIM
    one grant, 2022 · C$11k · revenue -36%
  • BJ
    BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · C$7k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
4
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
5
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
6
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
7
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
8
The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization

To establish maintain and support a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the jewish faith and to provide financial assictance in the form of bursaries and scholarships to students to assist in the costs of…

—
9
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
10
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
11
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
12
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congregation Chasidei Bobov and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$237,750 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$132,530 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA — C$130,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$50,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAS OHOLEI MENAHEM MENDEL — C$35,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBEIS MEIR — C$35,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHEDER CHABAD — C$24,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCARING KINDNESS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$23,500 over 5y, 23% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$22,950 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF TORONTO — C$13,180 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAYLA'S CHUILDREN CENTRE — C$11,340 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEZRAT MEHABRIM — C$11,290 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV — C$10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM LUBAVITCH — C$9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY MATTERS FUND — C$7,866 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FUNDS FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — C$7,580 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION — C$7,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBROTHERS OF MERCY — C$6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHATZOLO — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMY CHARITY FUND — C$3,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI CHILD CARE SERVICES — C$3,715 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM — C$3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOBOV — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYISMACH MOSHE — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTORAH V'AVODAH MINYAN — C$696 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT AIM PROGRAMS — C$435 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The F&R Hauer Charitable FoundationON20.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 861508174:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chevra Oseh Chesed Financial Assistance Organization’s filings →