Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Chilliwack, BC · Charitable organization

Cheam View United Church

Weekly Sunday services and special services Easter and Christmas.

C$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$660
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$23k
C$11,638
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pacific Mountain Region of the United Church of CanadaC$11,702
United Church of CanadaC$11,638
Chilliwack Youth Health CentreC$500
Salvation ArmyC$160
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$172k · 6 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

C$172k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+32%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$94k · revenue +22%
  • PM
    Pacific Mountain Region of the United Church of Canada
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$73k · revenue +49%
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$4k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • RN
    Ruth & Naomi's Mission
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k
  • PC
    Pacific Community Resource Societygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$900 · revenue +28%
  • CL
    Chilliwack Learning Societygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$638 · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chilliwack Community Services

Staff and volunteers work side by side to provide a wide variety of programs and services in the following areas: strengthening families; developing children and youth into responsible citizens; enabling seniors and the disabled to lead…

—
2
Chilliwack Supportive Housing Society

Provided subsidized housing to low income individuals with mental illnesses in the chilliwack area.

—
3
Chilliwack Housing for Homeless Foundation

Alleviate homelessness by increasing housing supply. Work with other non profits for the best use of such housing.

—
4
British Columbia Community Renewal Society of the United Church of Canada

To advance religion by providing support to communities of faith and other ministries of The United Church of Canada through developing building acquiring owing leasing maintaining operating managing and providing housing to individuals…

—
5
Sunset Housing Society

To provide low income housing to senior citizens of british columbia

—
6
Chilliwack Crime Prevention Society
—
7
Chilliwack Youth Health Centre Society

CYHC has continued to offer low barrier physical and mental health care to young people ages 12 to 26.

—
8
Chilliwack Kiwanis Housing Society

Operation of a subisdized income housing complex in Chilliwack BC

—
9
British Columbia Mental Health Society Branch

The British Columbia Mental Health Society Branch (BCMHS) provides a diverse range of provincial specialized one-of-a-kind services for adults across the province; as well as provincial leadership for system-wide planning, research and…

—
10
Homelessness Services Association of Bc

The society provides support to and enhance the capacity of organizations in bc that serve the homeless and those at risk of homelessness. the society provides training to front line shelter workers throughout the province. there are…

—
11
Inclusion Chilliwack Society

• Provide staff supported housing (17 homes 50 residents) • Provide employment and job search support (Supported Employment Program) • Provide vocational options for adults at our Early Risers and Oasis Programs (recreation life skills…

—
12
Sunshine Coast Charitable Housing Society

Support affordable housing initiatives on the lower sunshine coast bc

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First United Church Community Ministry Society and the most unlike its peers is Vancouver School of Theology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada — C$94,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Mountain Region of the United Church of Canada — C$72,521 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetSalvation Army — C$4,040 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetPacific Community Resource Society — C$900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChilliwack Learning Society — C$638 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChilliwack Bowls of Hope Society — C$333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCyrus Centre — C$304 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVancouver School of Theology — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWilma's Transition House — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFirst United Church Community Ministry Society — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First West FoundationUnited Way British Co…Vancouver FoundationCHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
First West FoundationBC7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First West Foundation · United Way British Columbia · Vancouver Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118852888:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Cheam View United Church’s filings →