Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

Charleswood United Church

Unchanged from previous years

C$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$20k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$55k
C$1,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION & SERVICEC$54,604
1 JUST CITYC$5,646
CHARLESWOOD REFUGEE ECUMENICAL SPONSORSHIP FUNDC$2,500
CANADIAN FOOD GRAINS BANKC$1,915
WILLOW PLACEC$1,226
WESTGROVE SCHOOLC$1,150
BEAVERLODGE SCHOOLC$1,040
THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDSC$1,000
PALLIATIVE MANITOBAC$1,000
SANDY SALTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTREC$1,000
OAK TABLEC$600
TOBA CENTRE FOR CHILDREN & YOUTHC$507
ROSSBROOK HOUSEC$500
AGAPE TABLEC$500
DAYS FOR GIRLSC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$633k · 20 repeat orgsC$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
37

Total granted

C$633k
C$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+43%

Still filing today

65%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    I JUST CITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$59k · revenue +223%
  • CC
    CHRISTMAS CHEER BOARD
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$56k · revenue +76%
  • SM
    ST. MATTHEWS MARYLAND
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • OE
    OPERATION EZRA (JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MANITOBA
    one grant, 2020 · C$10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$7k
  • CR
    CHARLESWOOD REFUGEE ECUMENICAL TEAM SPONSORSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mennonite Central Committee Manitoba Inc.

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Manitoba supports the international relief development and peace…

—
2
Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity Inc.

Mobilizing volunteers and community partners Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity works with people from all walks of life to build safe and affordable housing for purchase by low-income working families.

—
3
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Saskatchewan Inc.

Provide temporary lodging meals and other support to sick children and their families via the ronald mcdonald house and family room; facilitating emotional and physical comfort and allowing caregivers' increased ability to spend more time…

—
5
Manitoba Food Charter Inc.

To work with people in manitoba to increase opportunities for people to eat good food

—
6
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—
7
Hospitality House Refugee Ministry Inc.

Hhrm is a non-profit organization in winnipeg manitoba canada. our goal is to sponsor as many refugees as possible so long as they arrive safely and have access to proper living conditions once here. we strongly believe that it is our…

—
8
Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation

Manitoba habitat conservancy (mhc) is manitoba's leading habitat and wildlife-focused charity directly implementing voluntary long-term conservation through perpetual conservation agreements and habitat improvement through restoration and…

—
9
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—
10
Manitoba Association of Foodbanks Inc.

Manitoba association of food banks distributes food to food bank around the province of manitoba.

—
11
Manitoba House Drop-in and Resource Centre Inc.

Mb house is a drop-in centre for children aged five to twelve years. the organization holds sessions designed to foster positive relationships for the children with caring adults. life skills and academic support are also an important part…

—
12
Saskatoon Interval House Inc.

The charity provides emergency shelter to abused women and their children who are in need of safe accommodation. the charity also provides counselling services and child care services.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The Compassionate Friends Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetI JUST CITY — C$59,005 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS CHEER BOARD — C$56,498 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetST. MATTHEWS MARYLAND — C$9,755 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWILLOW PLACE — C$6,940 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK — C$6,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS — C$6,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetPALLIATIVE MANITOBA — C$5,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSANDY SALTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE — C$5,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMB INTER FAITH IMMIGRATION CAUNAL — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUGUSTINE UNITED CHURCH — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTOBA CENTRE FOR CHILDREN + YOUTH — C$1,333 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROSSBROOK HOUSE — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPWRDF — C$750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAIROS — C$650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrace Community Church — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAYS FOR GIRLS — C$400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANDALE HOUSE — C$400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASSINIBOINE PARK CONSERVANCY (AUSTRALIAN WILDFIRES) — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CHURCH IN MEADOWOOD — C$365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST MANITOBA — C$270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CARE MANITOBA — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END PROPRIN — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSSBROOK HOUSE INC — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE HAVEN — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD NUTRITION COUNCIL OF MANITOBA — C$49 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds I JUST CITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS CHEER BOARD ↗
  • Who funds ST. MATTHEWS MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds PALLIATIVE MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds SANDY SALTEAUX SPIRITUAL CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds MB INTER FAITH IMMIGRATION CAUNAL ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTINE UNITED CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds TOBA CENTRE FOR CHILDREN + YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds ROSSBROOK HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PWRDF ↗
  • Who funds KAIROS ↗
  • Who funds Grace Community Church ↗
  • Who funds DAYS FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds CANDALE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ASSINIBOINE PARK CONSERVANCY (AUSTRALIAN WILDFIRES) ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHURCH IN MEADOWOOD ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB15.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Wellington West Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · The Cardinal Foundation · The Asper Foundation · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · Price Family Foundation Inc. · Alan and Doreen Thompson Charitable Foundation Inc. · The Upside Down Tree Family Foundation Inc. · First Unitarian Universalist Church of Winnipeg Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 106909252:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Charleswood United Church’s filings →