Shediac Cape, NB · Charitable organization
Centre Nouvelle Vie
Religious worship and teachings activities for the community and childrens
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA MARITIME DISTRICT | C$9,266 |
| VESTIAIRE ST-JOSEPH INC. | C$3,405 |
| RATIO CHRISTI CANADA | C$3,355 |
| EGLISE NOUVELLE ESPERANCE | C$3,205 |
| INSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUEBEC | C$1,200 |
| PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$665 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$14k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$25k · revenue +22%
- VSVESTIAIRE ST-JOSEPH INC.4× · 2021–2024 · C$11k · revenue +30%
- RCRATIO CHRISTI CANADA2× · 2023–2024 · C$6k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- MCMINISTERE CROIX ET VIE INCone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -14%
- NRNAOMI & RUTHone grant, 2023 · C$920 · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Administrer et maintenir une église évangélique et proclamer l'évangile de jésus-christ
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Culte évangélique biblique
Tenir et administrer une église évangélique
Enseignement des préceptes bibliques et prédicaiton de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Annoncer l'évangile de jésus-christ par l'enseignement et la prédication afin d'accomplir des oeuvres de bienfaisance
Évangélisation
Organiser administrer et maintenir une eglise evangelique dont l'objectif est la proclamation de l'évangile de jésus-christ.
Religious instruction counselling visitation congregational wordshipping evangelism
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada/Les Assemblees De La Pentecote Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Naomi & Ruth Women's Wellness Centre Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARITIME DISTRICT PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds VESTIAIRE ST-JOSEPH INC. ↗
- Who funds VICTORY WORSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds RATIO CHRISTI CANADA ↗
- Who funds EGLISE NOUVELLE ESPERANCE ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge ↗
- Who funds MINISTERE CROIX ET VIE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT BIBLIQUE DU QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds NAOMI & RUTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centre Chretien Evangelique · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.